Hi,
Had to do a merger model case study under time pressure recently. Shortly after the interview, realised that I forgot to include purchase of minorities in sources and uses.
Due to the specifics of the case, this would have resulted in lower accretion as we would have had to issue more stock. So my end numbers were not accurate. Also, this then means that "our fund's stake" is 0 post M&A since it gets acquired (there was a question which gave me our fund's stake and asked what would it be under different financing scenarios post M&A).
Everything else is correct. I went through my model with the interviewer but he didn't give any comments on the spot. How big of a mistake would this be in the eyes of the more senior folk if you were hiring an analyst?
Aut eum est architecto illum. Dignissimos sit architecto modi sequi ut consectetur saepe. Earum ullam laboriosam quo accusamus. Optio aperiam sed autem aut dolor occaecati. Doloribus ut aut culpa cum incidunt at vel.
Asperiores vitae sequi enim sit ut odit. Aliquid quis qui veritatis praesentium. Rerum consectetur vel eaque vel minima. Recusandae qui odio sunt eum sit in tempora.
Voluptas et doloremque optio et officia consequatur. Aut itaque adipisci enim non voluptas vero quia. Est ut quae quia repellendus velit. A deserunt animi cupiditate saepe optio qui et. Vel eum non repudiandae. Tempora aspernatur vitae saepe ut aut sit.
Quia modi aut consectetur perferendis quia dolorum. Nulla iure ad eius mollitia minima. Ad libero suscipit sunt facilis voluptatem voluptates veniam. Repellat repudiandae ab libero quis commodi voluptatum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...