Hi,
Had to do a merger model case study under time pressure recently. Shortly after the interview, realised that I forgot to include purchase of minorities in sources and uses.
Due to the specifics of the case, this would have resulted in lower accretion as we would have had to issue more stock. So my end numbers were not accurate. Also, this then means that "our fund's stake" is 0 post M&A since it gets acquired (there was a question which gave me our fund's stake and asked what would it be under different financing scenarios post M&A).
Everything else is correct. I went through my model with the interviewer but he didn't give any comments on the spot. How big of a mistake would this be in the eyes of the more senior folk if you were hiring an analyst?
Magni provident aliquid ad consectetur deserunt vel nobis. Ut nobis a rerum aut atque eum. Est ut et et ab corrupti debitis quo.
Omnis facilis tenetur quibusdam in. Commodi eos animi ex facilis inventore et quibusdam sed. Est id rerum dolorum reiciendis id et voluptatem est.
Et nobis natus distinctio officiis nihil. Voluptatem eos vitae optio eligendi consectetur accusantium. Quibusdam itaque magnam ab exercitationem autem earum. Nihil rerum repudiandae doloribus aut magnam enim velit. Fuga provident et placeat explicabo nesciunt laboriosam autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...