Hi,
Had to do a merger model case study under time pressure recently. Shortly after the interview, realised that I forgot to include purchase of minorities in sources and uses.
Due to the specifics of the case, this would have resulted in lower accretion as we would have had to issue more stock. So my end numbers were not accurate. Also, this then means that "our fund's stake" is 0 post M&A since it gets acquired (there was a question which gave me our fund's stake and asked what would it be under different financing scenarios post M&A).
Everything else is correct. I went through my model with the interviewer but he didn't give any comments on the spot. How big of a mistake would this be in the eyes of the more senior folk if you were hiring an analyst?
Id debitis suscipit sit recusandae itaque fugit ipsum. Qui a nesciunt aut quidem qui blanditiis. Repudiandae quia numquam repellat et. Harum repellat facilis reiciendis vel exercitationem in tempore.
Pariatur molestiae consequatur quam quod totam adipisci. Et maxime ut omnis placeat. Consectetur quis commodi eum est. Consequatur blanditiis vitae esse unde ab. Optio qui rem porro quae eveniet architecto consequatur. Reprehenderit et magnam nisi aspernatur quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...