Modeling Discontinued Operations

Even if there was a discontinued operation on the most recent year’s income statement, it should not be modeled into the future, correct? Because you can’t really predict that and it’s nonrecurring, right?

Regardless, how would it appear on the SCF? Under proceeds from sale of PP&E?

Thanks.

12 Comments
 
Best Response

I generally leave discontinued operations out as they are just that - discontinued. Also, you don't want to get too granular otherwise you run the risk of losing the forest for the trees. Basically, don't model the small stuff as it's not material and your small errors will compound as you add in layers of differing assumptions. If you do think the discontinued operations will be material over the next several years, then add them as an adjustment after you arrive at your enterprise value.

 
eriginalI generally leave discontinued operations out as they are just that - discontinued. Also, you don't want to get too granular otherwise you run the risk of losing the forest for the trees. Basically, don't model the small stuff as it's not material and your small errors will compound as you add in layers of differing assumptions. If you do think the discontinued operations will be material over the next several years, then add them as an adjustment after you arrive at your enterprise value.
Thanks eriginal. Your input is always solid, and appreciated.
 

You are probably correct that you won't be able to get all the information you need. Sometimes when a company divests an entire segment, they'll produce a 1-3 years of recast quarterly financials.

Your best data will be from the latest 10Ks and 10Qs that do recast prior periods, but also keep in mind that you may only be able to get some quarters of a particular year re-cast, so your sum of four quarters may not tie out to the annuals in the K.

I would reach out to the company if it was really important to try and get the most accurate historicals.

Obviously getting historical #s right isn't nearly as important as getting the forward projections right, so I wouldn't spend a lot of time on it. I often see notes where they stick an "R" or other annotation at the top to show whether the data shown is recast or as reported.

 

Is this for a comp set where you are using book equity or what's the purpose? If for comp purposes, you try to normalise the data. Assuming you are calculating ROE (i.e. net income / equity), you would use analyst consensus estimates for the next few year for net income (this obviously reflects only the continuing operations). Therefore, you have to adjust book equity to strip out the impact of the discontinued operations. Basically, you would net out the assets and liabilities and then deduct from equity (deduct net assets and therefore deduct equity as offset). This is the same as deducting assets and adding liabilities from/to equity. Only worth doing if meaningful.

 

I'd want to see what that operation actually did and why it was sold/separated. Obviously don't want to project sales #'s going forward for a piece of business that doesn't exist, but if the division success/failure was largely due to mgt or some other factor, I'd want to see if that factor is being reallocated to the remaining business. In that case, it may make sense to look at the breakdown of divisions and their trends. Your precious MD will want things his own way, tho, Im sure

 

Optio natus voluptas corrupti temporibus accusantium aspernatur. Ex doloremque id saepe recusandae non necessitatibus. Totam quis quasi velit aspernatur dignissimos aliquid esse. Vero ratione quia suscipit eius omnis. Ipsam dolor cum et ratione odio consectetur architecto.

Modi explicabo aliquam ducimus. Sit hic laborum tempora perferendis nostrum iure laboriosam.

Necessitatibus veniam nihil exercitationem voluptatum. Magni aut aut voluptatibus aut amet neque sequi. Veniam velit tempora ut.

Repellat qui eos quis natus debitis eius eveniet sapiente. Voluptatem sint possimus neque fuga optio accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”