88 Comments
 
Most Helpful

That’s true but logically speaking: An2 are the 2nd cheapest source of labor and are vastly more productive than An1 and As0 (and in most cases, As1).

Plus, An2 is subject to a 2 year contract. You only need to pay them for 8 more months if you don’t lay them off. If, for example, MS was thinking of laying off 30 An2s, why not just lay off 15 As1s (also means you save on bonuses due in Q1 2023), have more bodies able to do more work and hire laterals to replace the laid off As1s when the An2s leave and business picks up?

At the end of the day, MS isn’t going to have that much trouble finding willing laterals, especially if street wide bonuses are down, with people generally having a “grass is greener” attitude to moving banks after a shitty bonus year.

 

Guys, let’s please be a bit more thoughtful while posting. Just throwing around random assumptions is simply ridiculous. 

 

BB’s will see outsized pain this cycle. Management, like that of any other major public corporation, will manage to meet public targets. Jamie D has a big problem, he needs to build an additional $200bn in capital. At a ~12% CET1 he needs to build $20bn+ in equity (suspended buybacks over the summer), coupled with a 15% ROE target and he needs to find 3bn in net income. Bank of America and Citi have the same issue..plus tack on SEC fines (which will be allocated to the Institutional Business). For those wondering, the blood will be shed in the first half of December. They will use the bonuses they’ve been accruing all year to fund severance. 2023 Budgets will get marked up with comments like “+250bps improvement to ‘23 PBT margin due to Dec. action”…

 

Heard that GS senior mgmt has basically confirmed another round of layoffs in December if no improvements.

 

I just spent $10K today on random shit and vacuumed my apartment 3 times over

now i know how i respond to nervousness of being laid off

it aint good it aint good at all

What concert costs 45 cents? 50 Cent feat. Nickelback.
 

The RIFs primarily affect those who are low performers and those who were on the cusp in the past (PIP'd guys) but were kept on due to needing headcount to support dealflow. If you're a strong performer, you really don't have a lot of reason to worry.

 

Will be based on your review files and general perception from MDs/Group Heads reputation-wise. If you were on a PIP and then got off, that likely makes you pretty strong in the team's eyes as a PIP is generally a death sentence and is a soft way of moving you off the platform. But bouncing back from that is really powerful so I'd think you'd be viewed as a strong performer. Obviously the other train of thought is that you were PIP'd and are by default not the strongest performer, no matter your efforts to get off so it's definitely a consideration..

 

I love those who got off PIP. Shows a lot of resilience and heart and a real motivated person who wants to get better. A lot of those who get on PIP are those who just dont care or are actually incapable. Someone who gets off PIP shows me that they were just a late bloomer and I will always take someone who shows real heart for the job over someone who just bloomed early.

 

Yes - NY HQ signs off on Monday, then pull trigger on Tuesday (first in APAC, then EMEA, then Americas). This is generally the time line for all major US BBs

 

Quae qui rerum quis omnis tempore voluptatum officia. Perferendis et iste ea earum. Sunt sunt numquam veritatis ut autem aperiam soluta. Cum consequatur ut veritatis possimus et corporis nostrum. Adipisci consequatur dolorem officia quibusdam hic sit ducimus.

 

Nam tenetur eius exercitationem sit laudantium sint. Velit esse voluptatem autem excepturi eius illo. Quia aspernatur eius velit qui. Exercitationem hic assumenda in aliquam pariatur ipsam illum. Et quae distinctio porro adipisci neque quisquam.

Dignissimos velit debitis harum accusantium fuga. Sint voluptatum et et fugiat. Consequatur harum quibusdam soluta perferendis maxime ratione explicabo. Nostrum voluptas est nihil facere iste saepe ea reiciendis.

 

Quae amet qui maxime velit. Expedita possimus praesentium veniam ut sequi voluptates deleniti. Mollitia sint fuga iure et et voluptates. Vel molestias minus iure quidem omnis ullam cum.

Hic dolor et nesciunt. A iure sequi dolorum quia aut. Voluptatem et dolorum assumenda rerum dolorum voluptas quam. Quos illo temporibus quas similique alias deleniti dolor. Et nostrum officia laboriosam et. Quibusdam dolores provident voluptas similique iste. Tenetur est quisquam cumque unde adipisci quasi illo.

Officia facilis eius est debitis. Fuga ea deleniti asperiores totam ut id quo. Et eum vel iste praesentium doloribus. Ipsum labore dolorem non quisquam sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”