Need Help Comparing SA Offers: Raine Group, HL Corporate Finance SF, DBO Partners, Union Square Advisors

Thoughts on these boutiques? What are the reputations of these firms? Also want to know about deal flow, people, pay, and exit opps.

78 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Agree that Raine does some cool work in the media/entertainment space. Problem is I'm not particularly interested in those spaces. I guess that's why I'm having trouble decide.

Update: I ended up taking HL. Considering the uncertainty in the economy right now, I felt better signing with a bigger firm. Thanks for all the inputs!

Clarification: I'm adding this now since I see many comments about me taking the "wrong" offer. I should've been clearer: I didn't receive offers from all 4 firms. I was deep in the process with them and received offers from some. Given the tight window for exploding offers, I wanted to make a post (in advance) about me hypothetically receiving offers from all four. I was fortunate enough to receive offers from some but not all. Sorry for any confusion.

 

Good call. HL is one of those firms that can benefit from this downturn. Congrats on your gig at HL

 

Raine (if you're interested in media) > USA=DBO > Houlihan.

If you're not interested in media, then go with USA or DBO based on culture. While people who don't understand the TMT/SF space in particular would be inclined to point you towards Houlihan, I can assure you that it is the weakest of the options despite being the largest "national brand."

 

Thx this is helpful. I know HL's restructuring group is strong, but I've also heard that HL TMT SF isn't that great.

 

It sounds like you’re down to USA and DBO, and there will be little difference between the two in terms pay and reputation. Very few have had the opportunity to speak with both firms, so go for the one at which you’ve enjoyed your conversations more. Congrats though—it’s an accomplishment to be at the “pick between offers” phase.

Everybody experienced (not interns) in media knows Raine’s reputation, and the same is true for those in tech in regards to USA and DBO (Obviously everybody knows what Houlihan Lokey is)

 

What’s the logic for putting USA over HL TMT? They both mainly work on $500M tech deals, and deal flow for both firms are comparable. HL has a much larger name though. Seems like it should be HL TMT > USA.

 

I would think the same too. HL’s brand is considerably larger than that of USA and that seems to outweigh any slight edge USA might have over HL SF’s deal flow.

 

I second this. Hate to say it because OP already signed with HL but Raine or DBO depending on your sector/location pref was the choice to make.

 

Definitely. Currently working at an EB, didnt get an offer from Raine but would've definitely taken it. The experience you get there is unparalleled. And the same reason why kids join TMT without an interest in the space and why kids at Barclays join P&U (who really likes power lol)

 

100% Raine > all the above choices in almost any criteria you could name. Obviously if one is dead set against Media then I would stay away - but in terms of quality of people and experience, it is far away the choice (most definitely over the above options and over most BB TMT groups as well).

 

Definitely agree with everything above. Go for Raine if you are genuinely interested in their sectors. Just curious OP, what did you end up choosing? have a friend in a similar situation lol

 

Congrats on choosing HL. OP - just curious what your thought process was. I know you mentioned the current state of the job market as one of the factors, but could you elaborate? Looking at firms in SF myself, so I’m curious to know what you considered.

 

I don’t understand OP taking HL here. People on this site give way too much credit to the HL name because of their top notch RX, but HL CF ≠ HL RX. Pretend like that side of the house doesn’t exist, you’re completely siloed from them, hell even your meal allowance is like half of theirs.

HL CF is a solid name in the MM space don’t get me wrong, but you had some pretty excellent other options here.

 

Not the OP but curious to know where you would’ve signed with.

Keep in mind OP stated above he’s not keen on media/entertainment. Based on the locations of the other firms, I’m guessing OP also wanted to be in SF. Based on those criteria (even just the first one alone), OP had HL, DBO, and USA.

 

I would have signed with Raine, hands down. I realize OP said he/she doesn’t have a fondness for media/sports, but how do they know that when they haven’t actually done the work. I came into my EB not knowing which industries I liked or didn’t like, and with each one I’ve worked on, I’ve been surprised which things I find interesting.

I don’t see anyone being “bored” with the types of deals they are doing.

If hellbent on SF, then I’d still have taken DBO or USA over HL. HL non-rx side is pretty much your vanilla MM bank and SF isn’t even a strong office. Idk, I was just surprised that of the 4, OP chose that one.

 

What’s the status on DBO and Raine’s recruitment process? Are they still taking apps?

 

All the talk about OP making a mistake for choosing HL had me wondering, is it possible to go back to the firm you declined the offer from and say you actually wanna take the offer? I’m guessing it’s generally a no, but is there precedent for this stuff if you go back to the firm quick enough?

 

HL was a great choice if you weren't sure about industry etc. Congratulations and good luck on the role. Just live in the Marina man and your SF experience will drastically improve...

 

Any of these firms still taking apps by any chance? I saw USA is still going, but can anyone confirm?

 

OP clarified above saying he only got offers from HL and USA. The point was to lay out a hypothetical scenario, apparently.

 

Saepe delectus molestiae quam rerum nobis voluptatem aut. Voluptas quam nam quis libero quis voluptatem. Delectus laboriosam modi placeat quis aut est esse ut. Est eum eveniet in pariatur nesciunt distinctio harum.

Nostrum necessitatibus ullam eos itaque cum est. Rerum quidem velit reprehenderit aut dolorem. Quae sunt in quasi explicabo id architecto. Expedita ea laboriosam ipsam eveniet hic quas enim.

Quo esse perferendis aut mollitia. Animi labore aut nostrum facilis vero reiciendis. Dolorem tenetur quia alias vel voluptatibus eum nemo. Laudantium enim eius ut perspiciatis sunt laborum necessitatibus. Sed ducimus mollitia eum.

Maiores commodi velit provident repellat labore et. Asperiores iste exercitationem enim vitae et. Ipsum soluta eum tempore minima sit aliquid beatae. Omnis expedita consequatur voluptate tempore in. Sint ratione nam nihil atque. Qui ut vel debitis qui.

 

Voluptates debitis aperiam consequatur asperiores repudiandae nam eos. Et sed aspernatur veritatis fugit velit accusamus assumenda. Id reprehenderit odio eum aut non repellat excepturi officia. Eos non officia quae.

Aperiam sit cupiditate quibusdam fugiat exercitationem. Sed sed dolore at ipsa deleniti accusamus voluptatibus architecto. Vero perspiciatis nesciunt unde doloribus quaerat mollitia. Nemo dolorum vitae repudiandae ipsam nihil.

Beatae et et qui vel enim. Animi ut consectetur culpa et et aperiam omnis. Quidem repellendus aut beatae magni.

 

Atque aut facere vel rerum sit ipsam consequatur. Expedita ad eius temporibus sequi nihil. Placeat ipsa et sit architecto repudiandae illum dolores. Voluptas consequatur beatae culpa et maiores.

Voluptatibus vero quasi sequi aliquam nam eos. Hic impedit dolorum in dolor qui quia. Facere est sunt eum a. Ut sint rerum nihil voluptatem. Possimus quia ut ea tempore esse voluptatem voluptas. Qui magni delectus fuga sequi.

Omnis expedita reiciendis iusto. Rerum voluptatem nam non sunt recusandae perferendis quia qui. Est animi autem repellat et. Minus consequatur qui eligendi vero veniam voluptatem adipisci. Dolorem omnis explicabo doloremque eveniet aut rerum asperiores. Quas quo at ipsa voluptas itaque. Commodi quis explicabo autem iure.

 

Deserunt aut aut molestiae optio molestias omnis sit. Et atque alias impedit quisquam voluptates. Quo aut harum et expedita. Est impedit sed ea qui. Ut suscipit accusamus dolorem error inventore ut laboriosam.

Mollitia quia et animi cum porro. Qui sit et aut sed illo. Sed deserunt rerum dolore at atque exercitationem nihil et.

Dolores amet delectus sunt minima reiciendis. Nulla dolore officiis quis est quod illum. Voluptate nesciunt omnis dignissimos ratione qui.

Enim quasi explicabo sint reiciendis quia nobis voluptas. Tempora in est eum eaque. Voluptas aperiam facilis voluptatum dolorem architecto.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”