I understand that for EV/EBITDA to make sense, EV should include the minority interest of company B because EBITDA includes it because of the consolidated statments.
But what if we are not using EV in a multiple and we just want to know its value, would't it be wrong to add a minority interest that it does not own? Which is the reason to add it?
| +175 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 33 | 3h |
| +172 | Who Killed Wall Street | 54 | 37m |
| +163 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 3d |
| +117 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 22 | 6h |
| +94 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 3d |
| +54 | How bad did I mess up | 11 | 1h |
| +42 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 20 | 1d |
| +38 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 4d |
| +34 | Most technical groups? | 18 | 11h |
| +29 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Ut ut amet maxime dolores. Tempore rerum aut autem facere voluptates quia id. Laudantium deserunt laudantium quibusdam sapiente quia. Et odio fugit incidunt sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...