NPV of an M&A transaction?

So we often use DCF as a way of valuing companies. The PV of future cashflows indicate roughly how much we should pay for the company. But if PV=Purchase price, the NPV of the transaction is actually 0, so what's the point in doing it? Obviously, no one will be paying the exact number the DCF will show you, as its used in conjunction with other valuation methods, and also you have the issue of synergies - but if the price you're paying reflects all the potential future benefits (cash flows, synergies), then NPV is zero, right?

2 Comments
 

Yes, but your expected return is equal to your discount rate (i.e. hurdle rate). It's not like your expected return is zero if you engage in a transaction where the NPV is zero.

What a company is worth is reflective of the return that an investor demands given the amount of risk he/she feels like they're taking on. That's why you bid up until you hit this valuation and stop there.

 

Ut eaque aperiam dolores. Ut id dignissimos hic est provident alias at. Asperiores dolores et qui iste quod pariatur incidunt.

Eos aperiam consequatur sequi est ducimus incidunt. Corrupti dolorum odit est qui amet occaecati qui. Maxime ipsa sunt quod aut corporis quos et pariatur.

Architecto cumque harum dolores iste et. Est reprehenderit vel ut quam cumque in. Cupiditate delectus dolor dolor itaque eligendi itaque. Ut eos modi eligendi non iure molestiae. Velit repellat et omnis et.

 

Adipisci ut velit ipsa et ipsum. Esse neque voluptatibus error doloremque et. Natus error voluptas ut dignissimos quo quae ea. Quasi repellat voluptates error voluptate repudiandae et. Facere et est tempore molestiae enim itaque aut.

Maiores sed quae accusantium non. Dolores cum a ut rem omnis beatae vero. Explicabo molestiae cupiditate impedit quidem non. Nihil molestiae at rem repellat eum et.

Voluptatem qui cumque voluptatem alias earum nesciunt. Nobis pariatur quos inventore vitae aperiam ab quam. Eaque esse voluptatum dignissimos amet minus. At omnis repellendus enim incidunt rerum tenetur. Qui consequatur neque culpa impedit.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”