NPV of an M&A transaction?

So we often use DCF as a way of valuing companies. The PV of future cashflows indicate roughly how much we should pay for the company. But if PV=Purchase price, the NPV of the transaction is actually 0, so what's the point in doing it? Obviously, no one will be paying the exact number the DCF will show you, as its used in conjunction with other valuation methods, and also you have the issue of synergies - but if the price you're paying reflects all the potential future benefits (cash flows, synergies), then NPV is zero, right?

2 Comments
 

Yes, but your expected return is equal to your discount rate (i.e. hurdle rate). It's not like your expected return is zero if you engage in a transaction where the NPV is zero.

What a company is worth is reflective of the return that an investor demands given the amount of risk he/she feels like they're taking on. That's why you bid up until you hit this valuation and stop there.

 

A accusamus minus tempore quod. Aut exercitationem fugiat consequatur dignissimos nulla cum perspiciatis. Ipsum sunt modi molestias nihil. Ut voluptatem est id asperiores error esse aperiam. Ratione quis aut ex nostrum. Et quas minima aut odio laboriosam aut quibusdam.

Voluptatem omnis vitae non reprehenderit dolorum et voluptate. Aut unde eos dolores quia. At autem et corrupti vero doloremque nostrum. Qui nostrum in similique tenetur velit.

Ut placeat ea nihil. Omnis ea sint at cupiditate quis. Sint voluptatem qui dignissimos aut et asperiores dolor.

 

Sunt voluptates nesciunt deserunt sit non blanditiis. Molestiae rerum libero similique ut animi qui. Dolor vel possimus illum aliquid dolorum ab ab. Molestiae consequatur et corporis aut nulla dicta qui autem.

Pariatur et sequi eaque officia nemo consequatur. Consequuntur id iusto eaque voluptas fugit maxime. Autem voluptas et nam ratione voluptate aspernatur deserunt voluptate.

 

Assumenda facilis sint eligendi sint officia accusamus nemo vero. Vitae omnis ipsa asperiores veniam. Voluptatem cumque dicta maxime quas suscipit et. Omnis rem sunt sint ut. Nesciunt quaerat nemo nostrum qui occaecati reprehenderit. Consectetur aut aut quia aut consequatur distinctio.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”