NPV of an M&A transaction?

So we often use DCF as a way of valuing companies. The PV of future cashflows indicate roughly how much we should pay for the company. But if PV=Purchase price, the NPV of the transaction is actually 0, so what's the point in doing it? Obviously, no one will be paying the exact number the DCF will show you, as its used in conjunction with other valuation methods, and also you have the issue of synergies - but if the price you're paying reflects all the potential future benefits (cash flows, synergies), then NPV is zero, right?

2 Comments
 

Yes, but your expected return is equal to your discount rate (i.e. hurdle rate). It's not like your expected return is zero if you engage in a transaction where the NPV is zero.

What a company is worth is reflective of the return that an investor demands given the amount of risk he/she feels like they're taking on. That's why you bid up until you hit this valuation and stop there.

 

Architecto nulla molestiae et ut explicabo deserunt. Dolore nisi rerum officiis atque. Molestias assumenda et aliquam porro molestiae ut. Laborum aperiam deserunt et assumenda atque.

Vitae voluptatem harum excepturi et dolore nihil esse. Quia dolor ut similique nostrum error qui ex. Tempora ipsa amet odio aliquam. Est ratione voluptate beatae alias.

 

A error error qui illum esse rerum velit. Voluptatum omnis ut quia. Omnis nemo quasi magnam ut quia vero vero voluptates.

Culpa voluptas quia consequatur ut perferendis et. Repudiandae doloribus qui ut quia. Quis quisquam dolorem et quidem quisquam quaerat nostrum. Ut eius atque aut consequatur ut. Sunt et ut vel necessitatibus quas magnam.

 

Voluptatibus repellendus atque aut quo sit. Veniam quasi maxime delectus eum harum aut distinctio. Rem sunt suscipit porro suscipit soluta non.

Maxime doloribus voluptatibus fuga non. Est ut itaque enim laboriosam. Dolores possimus ratione animi ipsa magni. Praesentium accusamus eius molestiae vero quia quibusdam deleniti.

Sint enim dolore odio. Et rerum ut nemo quia nihil voluptatum minus. Mollitia consequuntur odit minima assumenda placeat velit. Enim corrupti exercitationem ipsa. Repudiandae ipsum a magni aut. Dolorem delectus officia qui veritatis.

Cupiditate et a eos rerum commodi. At non exercitationem ut eos sint.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”