Presume a company has identified an attractive target (public) but they cannot afford to acquire 100% (would exceed target debt ratios). Could it make sense to purchase a majority stake of <90%?
To me, it seems like a weird thing but I can't pinpoint why. With a majority of votes the acquirer should be able to implement its strategies. Any thoughts?
| +87 | Drunk VP. How to manage? | 28 | 21h |
| +57 | Who is the final boss in Houston Energy? (GS, JEFF or EVR) | 10 | 3h |
| +54 | [2026 - October] Unbiased Prestige Rankings | 22 | 13m |
| +44 | Lazard US Views 2026/2027 | 16 | 19h |
| +40 | McK vs A&M Offer Decision | 22 | 57m |
| +39 | Moelis PCA vs Lower tier BB Coverage | 24 | 5h |
| +37 | Tomorrow Will Be Better | 5 | 1d |
| +36 | Why Do We Turn Comments? | 5 | 1h |
| +22 | UBS’s Investment Bank Is Building an AI Slop Factory | 2 | 1d |
| +21 | How early is to early? | 9 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Expedita ut sed non a et suscipit. Fugiat commodi expedita tempora voluptatum doloremque modi praesentium et. Velit ex rerum veritatis voluptatem voluptate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...