Presume a company has identified an attractive target (public) but they cannot afford to acquire 100% (would exceed target debt ratios). Could it make sense to purchase a majority stake of <90%?
To me, it seems like a weird thing but I can't pinpoint why. With a majority of votes the acquirer should be able to implement its strategies. Any thoughts?
| +133 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 62 | 1h |
| +132 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 1d |
| +64 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 12 | 1h |
| +49 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 40 | 1h |
| +45 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 11 | 26m |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 1d |
| +32 | Investment Banking is Hard | 14 | 6h |
| +30 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 13 | 37m |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 5d |
| +21 | Who pays the highest right now? | 12 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Et molestias aut dolor sed. Veritatis odit eum molestias eum veniam. Unde veritatis ducimus repudiandae sint dolorem. Fuga et autem iusto facilis est. Corporis sequi vitae aut vitae mollitia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...