Does it make sense for a company to partially acquire a listed target that makes strategic sense when it cannot acquire 100% without exceeding debt target ratios?
Seems like a rare thing but I can't pinpoint why. The acquirer should be able to implement its strategy unless the target being listed specifically hinders it. Any thoughts?
| +465 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 50 | 2h |
| +228 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 58 | 2d |
| +85 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 12 | 2h |
| +75 | Incompetent and annoying co-intern | 23 | 5h |
| +67 | Getting Laid in IB? | 28 | 2d |
| +66 | Intern keeps sleeping at work - what to tell them | 28 | 8h |
| +55 | Living in greenwich as an analyst? | 12 | 5h |
| +39 | NYC Associate Budget | 14 | 9h |
| +36 | Nauseous every morning for past 3 years in IB, anyone else? | 21 | 1d |
| +35 | Quick Thoughts on CVC AI Sale Process | 7 | 11h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Velit deleniti dolore cumque. Qui enim numquam harum modi magni earum. Qui repudiandae rerum suscipit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...