Poll: Horizontal or Vertical Models?

Settling a debate - what does your bank use when building out 3 statement models? Vertical (ie 3 statements on 1 tab) or horizontal (3 statements across 3 tabs)? Also, in each of these cases, are inputs and outputs on separate tabs? THANK YOU!

26 Comments
 

I do 3statements on same tab.

If it’s just a run-if-the-mills financial model then inputs on same tab.. any special chart outputs on separate tab

If it’s a deep dive model that builds to financials through operations, then inputs often not on same tab as the 3 statement

Note that it’s often not the banks decision, it’s often times whoever builds the models decision on how to lay stuff like this out. Sometimes there are templates laid out a certain way but there are times when you won’t touch the template

 

Vertical models.

I like to have each line item built up (expenses, revenue build, capex/depreciation, etc.) on individual tabs and feed all of it into a 3 statement model on one tab. Outputs and various return analysis on separate tabs. I also like to do any capital structure adjustment on the three statement tab (more like 4 statements) so that there is not an empty column between historical and projected financials.

 
Funniest

I like having: - every line as own tab - every year as own workbook - every statement in different folder - then a separate file on my desktop with a bunch of indirects pulling stuff into outputs

 
Most Helpful

Tab 1: Summary tab (w transaction assumptions, summary returns, PF balance sheet, etc.) Tab 2: Model (full three statement with returns calc), vertical style Tab 3: Operating build

Generally all you need. I tend to create additional tabs for outputs / presslinks for presentations.

Obviously, depending on where you are in deal processes, these get much more complex. Deal that we just signed up has the following:

Summary tab Charts output tab S&U tab Historical P&L output tab Model cases P&l output tab LBO Model tab Operating build tab Top customer build tab

and then a few support tabs that are from various VDR files that i used to build the model. This is also fairly simple compared to a few others i've made that had probably 5-8 additional tabs dedicated to operating builds

"My name's Ralph Cox, and I'm from where ever's not gonna get me hit"
 

It depends on the level of complexity of the model. I like to keep constant assumptions (same for all years) on a cases tab because I can screw with column widths. I then do a vertical model tab for 3 statements. If there is a complex revenue build, that can go on a separate tab. I do a separate tab for complex ABL availability builds as well. Debt schedule ideally goes on the vertical model tab unless it is too complex. I have the luxury and burden of having complete control over the model, so I can do pretty much whatever I want. I try and make it so everything can be print formatted to avoid having to output tons of stuff to PowerPoint every time I share the model with my boss or management. Lenders and bankers are happy to get in XLS.

 

Velit quo molestiae cum voluptas. Labore consectetur et dolorem asperiores.

Culpa natus quo eveniet molestiae. Ipsa porro doloribus tenetur optio ab in. Fugit omnis eaque hic in et aut possimus. Facilis dolores placeat voluptatum esse hic cumque. Ut deserunt unde corporis eos accusamus.

Nesciunt ab debitis similique sit voluptatem consequatur modi. Nemo quia officiis est optio adipisci odio. Quidem vitae molestias dicta rerum in. Dolorem nobis et voluptates omnis.

Amet voluptatibus unde labore laudantium explicabo architecto. Unde eos at necessitatibus pariatur fuga. Magni maxime vel deleniti possimus ut.

 

Ut amet incidunt voluptatem nihil. Provident ipsa fuga magni autem voluptatum molestias rerum qui. Ea velit beatae eaque ut. Laborum labore sit libero quas est.

Iusto officiis voluptates magni modi suscipit. Minus ut aut asperiores consequatur dolorem rerum est. Voluptatem consequuntur corrupti aut rem. Optio excepturi quia eaque vel molestias animi enim. Dolorem quia quidem harum molestiae consequatur eius. Ea dolorem odio placeat expedita veritatis et est nisi. Exercitationem sed est consequatur.

Laboriosam velit magnam repudiandae. Quidem corporis sed consequatur aliquid. Et consequatur qui natus et ut. Vero at aut officia non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”