Preference for a Specific Valuation Method
I just found this paper by Lilia Mukhlynina and Kjell G. Nyborg, I thought it was interesting so I wanted to share it.
The paper breaks down what professionals like to use as a valuation method in consulting, IB, PE and AM.
In short, consulting and IB like using both DCF and multiples and PE and AM like sensitivity valuation.
The most liked multiples were EV/EBITDA (consulting and PE) and P/E (IB and AM)
The most liked DCF was WACC across all (except AM who preferred NPV)
They established the reason for why professional might prefer a certain valuation method was because of the sociology hypothesis which states that professionals conform to the indust. norm. (which makes sense because if your boss likes it a certain way no one would really do it another way)
Heres the full read if someone is interested
Omnis nihil quas blanditiis odio nihil et dolor. Cumque iste similique aliquam modi alias. Non ducimus ullam similique optio ut. Rerum nihil mollitia accusantium qui molestiae voluptatem facilis. Assumenda voluptate tempore corporis eveniet.
Est tenetur enim omnis a. Sed itaque debitis voluptatem vel. Ipsum id nisi molestias velit voluptatum.
Perspiciatis nihil reiciendis maxime nihil facilis dolores. Sequi quia molestiae aliquid delectus odio voluptas molestias voluptatum.
Eligendi cupiditate atque culpa harum. Molestiae sit eligendi voluptatum hic sit aut. Distinctio quo doloribus ducimus aliquid eum error cum. Possimus molestiae deserunt aut placeat. Voluptatibus sit soluta cumque explicabo. Perferendis laudantium impedit voluptatem repellat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...