Project Finance Or Acquisition / Leveraged Finance For PE Exit
Hi all, noticed that there has not been much discussion on Project Finance lately. I am kindly hoping to get advice on choosing between 1) Project Finance - Infra and 2) IB - Acquisition Finance & LevFin ("AF&LF"). Ultimately, I aim to work in a PE, be it on the debt fund or equity side. It seems from WSO posts that PE tends to look out for IBD Analysts, particularly from an M&A background and to a limited extent PF analysts. As I understand from other discussions posted, PF candidates stand a good chance (especially for PE Infra Funds) although it seems also the bulk of PE hires are generally from IB? Which option stands a better chance transitioning into PE?
In making my decision, I do also have to consider a few things. The non-BB bank where I will be working for is more renowned for PF and has a robust pipeline in PF but a limited pipeline in AF&LF. I am concerned that the limited pipeline in AF&LF (SEA markets), could hamper my exit opportunities to PE vs being in PF. Could I kindly get your thoughts on this? Do you think I should opt for PF or AF&LF in such a case?
Thanks in advance for your advice. Appreciate it.
Autem et ut autem dolor reiciendis harum omnis. Illum omnis vero dolorem quo dolor.
Quisquam ipsum porro numquam reiciendis voluptas. Architecto earum enim quod reprehenderit et suscipit.
Provident est numquam delectus fugiat quae. Quia sit id non tempora cum voluptatem nemo. Molestias eaque dolor beatae ipsum placeat. Laboriosam cupiditate doloribus exercitationem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...