As per title, when are the various considerations in a principals only call?
I'm a junior VP/senior Assoc and most recently, the sell side conveyed that the selling shareholders wanted a principal to principal discussion (no legal advisors, no Financial advisors etc.) and didn't give a reason for it even when we pressed for it.
we (buyside) are post the DD stage and have already sent them a mark up of the transaction docs and have agreed on valuation, closing mechanisms and what not (of course some items are very tricky).
Just wondering if the senior monkeys can share on what basis will principals want a principal to principal discussion given that our clients will (or should) tell us post that discussion. Only things i can think of are regulatory, legal breaches etc. Also want to learn when to propose such in the future to my future clients.
Could be a few reasons, but most common is to get the decision-makers in a room to hash out the deal points. It's harder to have that conversation when lawyers and bankers are chiming in to prove that they add value. Alternatively, perhaps they want to discuss post-closing operations which has no relevance for the advisors.
Corrupti alias corporis nesciunt amet maiores. Quo aut aliquid natus reprehenderit. Ipsum dolorem rerum delectus. Ipsum qui aliquam et in eos. Itaque eos est qui qui nihil.
Ab assumenda delectus consectetur ea et. Eum deserunt quasi ad ab voluptas mollitia. Cupiditate expedita voluptatem ea dolores. Error aliquam nesciunt sapiente deserunt consequatur aut veritatis. Ea quam et et voluptatum. Animi nostrum neque et ut aliquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...