Quick question about a multiple, just want to ascertain my thinking

If we are examining P/CF (for whatever reason), the denominator, CF, must be FCFE (free cash flow to equity), right? Cannot be FCFF (free cash flow to firm).

Apple/Apple

Orange/Apple

8 Comments
 
Best Response

It just depends what you mean by P. If P means the equity value (market cap, per share value, etc) then yes, you'd probably only want the denominator to be free cash to the equityholders. If you use free cash to the entire firm, then you'd want something more indicative of the entire business as your numerator, as in enterprise value.

It's basically the same idea as when it's okay to use P/E as opposed to EV/EBITDA or some similar metric. If the company is mainly equity then P/E is a fair multiple to use in assessing value, but the more cash-centric number that's probably better with a levered company or one with dogshit earnings is EV/EBITDA, though I personally hate EBITDA with a passion since it can be fucked with so easily.

 
BlackHatIt just depends what you mean by P. If P means the equity value (market cap, per share value, etc) then yes, you'd probably only want the denominator to be free cash to the equityholders. If you use free cash to the entire firm, then you'd want something more indicative of the entire business as your numerator, as in enterprise value.

It's basically the same idea as when it's okay to use P/E as opposed to EV/EBITDA or some similar metric. If the company is mainly equity then P/E is a fair multiple to use in assessing value, but the more cash-centric number that's probably better with a levered company or one with dogshit earnings is EV/EBITDA, though I personally hate EBITDA with a passion since it can be fucked with so easily.

Yes, this is exactly my thinking. Lol, if it is a tech company earning nothing, or losing money... EV/Sales. even worse, lol.

ty

The difference between successful people and others is largely a habit - a controlled habit of doing every task better, faster and more efficiently.
 
BlackHat though I personally hate EBITDA with a passion since it can be fucked with so easily.
Which is a good thing if you're in banking, and your client can't differentiate preferred stock from livestock.
 
Bruce WayneBuilding on this question, what's the difference between "Free Cash Flow" and "Free Cash Flow to Firm"? Sounds the same to me.

Free Cash Flow: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflow.asp#axzz29nHeyGuI Free cash Flow to Firm: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflowfirm.asp#axzz29nHeyGuI

^they don't explain the differences between the two

FCFF: Cash flow that DEBT and EQUITY holders have a "claim" on. Equity holders have exposure to it from dividends or buybacks, debt holders can get their claim via a principal repayment, or coupon payments.

in terms of valuation: we would discount using the WACC and come to enterprise value.

FCFE: This one nets out the debt holders' interest, so, it takes away interest payments, coupon repayments and other sinking fund type repayments, too.

Valuation: We would discount using the COST OF EQUITY and come to equity value.

If that is still confusing, I can post a video that is helpful.

The difference between successful people and others is largely a habit - a controlled habit of doing every task better, faster and more efficiently.
 
mhurricane
Bruce WayneBuilding on this question, what's the difference between "Free Cash Flow" and "Free Cash Flow to Firm"? Sounds the same to me.

Free Cash Flow: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflow.asp#axzz29nHeyGuI Free cash Flow to Firm: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflowfirm.asp#axzz29nHeyGuI

^they don't explain the differences between the two

FCFF: Cash flow that DEBT and EQUITY holders have a "claim" on. Equity holders have exposure to it from dividends or buybacks, debt holders can get their claim via a principal repayment, or coupon payments.

in terms of valuation: we would discount using the WACC and come to enterprise value.

FCFE: This one nets out the debt holders' interest, so, it takes away interest payments, coupon repayments and other sinking fund type repayments, too.

Valuation: We would discount using the COST OF EQUITY and come to equity value.

If that is still confusing, I can post a video that is helpful.

lol I should have made my question more clear.

I already understand everything you just listed. But Investopedia has separate definitions for Free Cash Flow, Free Cash Flow to Firm, Free Cash Flow to Equity, Unlevered Cash Flow and Levered Cash Flow. The equations given for them are all slightly different and that's what's confusing me. (e.g. levered cash flow and FCFE should be the same, no? but Investopedia says otherwise)

 

At impedit rerum officia saepe. Occaecati qui sed qui quam. Voluptas doloribus fugiat est tempora et corrupti laboriosam.

Commodi temporibus in et iste. Omnis dolor soluta ad totam minima aut. Sed odio nostrum doloremque ad qui.

Facilis aspernatur blanditiis in mollitia quis fugit molestias. Quisquam architecto qui sit aut. Voluptas animi impedit molestiae sed qui.

Cum nisi magnam et dolores ab. Et numquam eos ut nihil consectetur quis dolorum asperiores. Ut illo sed officia ut voluptas quis minima quam.

The difference between successful people and others is largely a habit - a controlled habit of doing every task better, faster and more efficiently.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”