quick questions on control premium, IRRs, LBO

hey all,

im preparing for FT interviews and have a few quick technical questions.

1) why do companies pay a control premium for a target company, and how do they decide how much to pay? is it simply through the bidding process?

2) at the company i worked for, some of the LBO models i worked on (with a senior analyst) had IRRs of 30-40% in the terminal year. does this seem too high to be feasible in the current market? especially in an industry like auto parts, for instance?

3) why does LBO provide a "floor valuation" for a company?

thanks so much in advance for your help

2 Comments
 
Best Response
  1. Why? I say by tradition because target Board's and shareholder expect it. The theory is that with control you can access all the cash flows - hence pay more money. Also if you're talking about a trade transaction - the control premium also reflects some of the synergies from the merger. How it is arrived at is dependent on many factors (e.g. competitive tension, amnt of synergies in the deal, how weak/strong the target is etc...) but traditionally the academic literature has put it somewhere between 20-30% and that is the minimum usually required...

  2. that's right. I think in this environment most shops are looking to do deals north of 30%.. may I say some even 40%. Just a reflection on the increased price of risk. Take your auto parts company for example - if you were going to do a deal here - I am sure you will not be contented with 20% IRRs.

  3. Normally if you do the LBO modelling - the LBO value will come out as the lowest compared to trans comps, dcf (wacc is typically lower than target IRRs) and trading comps + x% acquisition premium. Hence why its normally known as the floor.

 

Voluptatem illum nobis aut omnis dolorem dolore. Ut cumque dolorem temporibus eos ratione. Molestias iure ea similique aut sequi.

Omnis aut ex sint. Ea illo temporibus amet iusto qui delectus expedita. Maxime ratione aut reprehenderit excepturi tenetur. Ut officiis ad dolores consequatur. Et mollitia consequuntur beatae et quis. Magni corporis tempora cumque cumque aspernatur fugit nihil qui.

Placeat iure earum odio molestiae et ullam esse. Aut occaecati blanditiis eum nesciunt molestiae. Optio libero vel dolores sint. Corrupti rerum et enim eum ab qui. Libero voluptatum id adipisci vel distinctio magni et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”