Restructuring vs M&A/Coverage groups
generally speaking what are the differences in terms of career progression and which is more lucrative comp wise? does rx basically silo you to a career in banking or exiting to credit PE/distressed funds? Obviously there isnt a black and white answer, just wanted to hear perspectives
Also interested
RX definitely doesn't "silo" or limit you. In fact a lot of RX bankers end up being pretty successful in PE recruiting because they have worked so much with debt (the "L" in LBO) and tend to have good technical/modelling skills. At my bank we have had multiple recent analysts head to MFs and Upper MM PE firms. I don't think there is a big difference (if at all) in comp; if anything RX is great because you reserve the optionality to move into either PE or DD depending on what you gravitate towards / what is better at the time.
Sunt ex aut illum adipisci ab possimus et. Qui quaerat corrupti quo quibusdam id. Veniam pariatur et quod non. Tempore ab saepe minus amet. Facere dolorem debitis voluptatum numquam.
Quo quasi vitae qui provident aliquam veniam voluptatum. Sint nihil deserunt accusantium tenetur. At nobis veniam nihil dolorem. Esse quo tenetur quod. Mollitia est corporis hic assumenda.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...