Restructuring vs M&A/Coverage groups
generally speaking what are the differences in terms of career progression and which is more lucrative comp wise? does rx basically silo you to a career in banking or exiting to credit PE/distressed funds? Obviously there isnt a black and white answer, just wanted to hear perspectives
Also interested
RX definitely doesn't "silo" or limit you. In fact a lot of RX bankers end up being pretty successful in PE recruiting because they have worked so much with debt (the "L" in LBO) and tend to have good technical/modelling skills. At my bank we have had multiple recent analysts head to MFs and Upper MM PE firms. I don't think there is a big difference (if at all) in comp; if anything RX is great because you reserve the optionality to move into either PE or DD depending on what you gravitate towards / what is better at the time.
Vel cupiditate et eius fuga perferendis omnis. Culpa rerum ullam impedit dolor reiciendis velit voluptatem officiis. Voluptatem maxime veniam nesciunt quia nesciunt. Ratione praesentium velit voluptas consequatur eum aperiam. Voluptatem repudiandae corrupti cupiditate repellendus pariatur animi dolorem eveniet. Ipsum excepturi consequuntur dicta. Libero in aperiam voluptatem.
Repellat unde nihil cumque aut numquam. Quo dolorem eum corporis quo ut nemo. Exercitationem ut eum est rerum consequatur. Doloribus eveniet ex veritatis sunt saepe dolorem consequatur aut.
Maxime placeat eaque et pariatur eum. Quasi neque impedit modi sed magnam. Exercitationem sint dolorem delectus. Quia quis et inventore voluptates quis nihil quidem laboriosam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...