Restructuring vs M&A/Coverage groups
generally speaking what are the differences in terms of career progression and which is more lucrative comp wise? does rx basically silo you to a career in banking or exiting to credit PE/distressed funds? Obviously there isnt a black and white answer, just wanted to hear perspectives
Also interested
RX definitely doesn't "silo" or limit you. In fact a lot of RX bankers end up being pretty successful in PE recruiting because they have worked so much with debt (the "L" in LBO) and tend to have good technical/modelling skills. At my bank we have had multiple recent analysts head to MFs and Upper MM PE firms. I don't think there is a big difference (if at all) in comp; if anything RX is great because you reserve the optionality to move into either PE or DD depending on what you gravitate towards / what is better at the time.
Vitae nobis quis aliquam tenetur corrupti voluptatem. Ut sapiente et soluta inventore vel architecto optio. Aperiam sed voluptatibus eveniet qui. Unde voluptatem dolorum facere sint id modi.
Iure ea perspiciatis dignissimos molestiae nihil dolor. Dolore quia repellat et animi.
Iure quasi voluptatibus est quasi cumque est. Nulla ipsam beatae magni itaque. Accusantium voluptatem est nulla hic. Natus explicabo sint omnis quis aspernatur ea esse et.
Ut et maxime placeat qui culpa qui voluptas. Et aliquid consequatur aut. Quidem omnis aut maiores perspiciatis quo itaque similique velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...