Revisiting the prospects of M&A work

http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/as-the-ma-c…

I’ve raised a question regarding M&A prospects in the near future, and I thought when the market is bullish, M&A will be going gangbusters. On the other side, when the market is bearish(I wouldn’t call this current market situation bearish though..I’d describe it as toilet shit floating around the whole market)restructuring and strategic advisory work will increase. And I agree with all of the guys who posted their opinion about this issue at the above thread. But, I personally think there will be a big change in the near future. The force of the first big change in the past was due to the highly growing competition of the industry. Entry barriers of advisory are not that high, and if you had good track record and proprietary information to conduct the deal successfully, you were on the leading edge. But, considering the tenuous nature of the industry, lots of things changed. It became more like an exclusive sale these days, and competition to win a deal became fierce. I think one of the fundamental reason of the crisis stems from here. The valuation was unreasonable and many corporations took them at a cheap price. But this business is not commodity. I think this whole miserable event occurred when the corporations thought the investment bankers job shared near 100% similarity to commodity.
I think there will be a second big change in the industry. And this time it’s not because of competition. This time it’s due to market reaction. When every time there’s a big meltdown or debacle there is market reaction. I really don’t want to put government regulation in the market side, but if it does something on the behalf of the market participants, whether or not it works in a good way or a bad way, it should also be considered as a market reaction. We have to admit that I-bankers job until now in the M&A side was not that rewarding to the whole economy if you look at the result. Most of the deals were turned over. Although it might not share a lot of portion to the whole mess right now, the nature is the same. Somebody earned disproportionate share of money without creating economic value added! Regulatory bodies will throw on some strict measures and corporations will think more thoroughly to align the potential deals with their long term value.
I guess it’s time to change our way of working, or we will be a sunken boat with “once hubris” name tag attached.

0 Comments

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”