RX Case Study - Help on S&U and Capital Structure
I have received part of a case study from a friend but struggling to build the S&U and post transaction capital structure since I have never worked on any RX related models or topics.
Pre-Transaction Capital Structure and Transaction Fees:
$100M or Secured caims
$325M of priority claims
$4B unsecured claims
$20M transaction fees
Creditor Treatment:
$100M of secured claims: paid out with cash in full from proceeds of Opco Faciity
$325M of priority claims: receive 42% of Holdco Facility and 42% of ordinary shares
$4B unsecured claims: receive 58% of Holdco Facility and 58% of ordinary shares
Restructuring Plan:
New $200M Opco Facilty
$2.25B HoldCo Facility
No cash on BS, so basically we are having $200m of cash, $100m being used to repay secured debt and $20m will be needed to fund the transaction fees, leaving $80m of cash on BS. What I do not understand is the exchange of priority claims and unsecured claims in the HoldCo facility and how this would tie in a S&U and later in the capital structure, receiving 42% in the 2.25bn HoldCo facilty seems to be too high for $325m secured claims since they would be covered with c. 15% in that facility.
Would appreciate some insights, maybe I am not understanding the concept behind this.
To tackle this RX case study, let's break it down step by step based on the most helpful WSO content:
1. Pre-Transaction Capital Structure
2. Restructuring Plan
3. Sources and Uses (S&U)
The S&U table is a critical step to ensure all cash flows and allocations are accounted for. Here's how it looks:
Sources:
Uses:
4. Post-Transaction Capital Structure
After the restructuring, the capital structure will look like this:
Debt:
Equity:
Cash on Balance Sheet:
5. Addressing Your Concern
You mentioned that 42% of the $2.25B HoldCo Facility seems too high for $325M of priority claims. Here's why it makes sense:
This type of allocation is common in RX scenarios, where negotiations determine the split based on recovery expectations, legal priorities, and bargaining power.
6. Key Takeaways
If you're still struggling, focus on building a simple model that tracks the flow of funds from sources to uses and ties it to the post-transaction structure.
Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/how-to-prepare-for-restructuring-technical-questions?customgpt=1, Got this task during an Private Equity internship interview, how to handle it?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/hedge-fund/qa-credit-analyst-at-5b-distressed-shop?customgpt=1, Week 3 of IBD Internship: The Pitch
TBH the AI bot pretty much covered it so won't repeat it. Only caveat is when we think of S&U typically we think of cash sources & uses so really the exchange of the priority and unsecureds would often be excluded from an S&U table, but its not categorically wrong to leave it in there.
Minus perspiciatis odit et. At accusantium est sit omnis magnam. Vitae optio aperiam sed qui consequatur officia voluptas. Tempore minus autem illum vel quisquam quod et. Omnis sequi rerum explicabo. Quidem et eveniet dicta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...