SA Return Offer

When it comes to end of internship discussions on who gets a return, what are the main factors? How does it get weighed between work and personality? I am in a group with quite a few people, so it would be hard to get to meet everyone personally. Are the more junior people the main ones deciding? Or should I also spend some time meeting the seniors?

9 Comments
 

When it comes to end-of-internship discussions about return offers, here’s what you need to know based on the most helpful WSO content:

Key Factors for Return Offers

  1. Work Performance:

    • Your ability to deliver high-quality work is critical. This includes desk work, case studies, or final presentations, depending on what your group values most.
    • Being reliable, detail-oriented, and proactive in your tasks will make a strong impression.
  2. Personality and Fit:

    • Personality plays a significant role. Teams want to work with someone they can tolerate for long hours. Being personable, humble, and easy to work with is often as important as technical skills.
    • Avoid coming across as arrogant or overly confident, as this can be a dealbreaker.
  3. Interaction with Colleagues:

    • Building strong relationships with your immediate team (analysts, associates, and VPs) is crucial. These are the people who will have the most exposure to your work and will likely advocate for you during discussions.
    • Networking with senior members (Directors and MDs) is also important, as they often have the final say in hiring decisions.
  4. Feedback and Advocacy:

    • Analysts and associates often have significant influence in the decision-making process. If they like working with you and can vouch for your work ethic and personality, it will go a long way.
    • Mentors or buddies who take an interest in your development can also advocate for you during discussions.

Weighing Work vs. Personality

  • While technical competence is assumed, personality and fit often tip the scales. If you’re equally skilled as another intern, being more likable and easier to work with can make the difference.
  • The decision often boils down to whether the team can see themselves working with you for 16+ hours a day.

Who Decides?

  • Junior Team Members (Analysts and Associates):

    • They are typically the ones who work most closely with you and provide the bulk of the feedback during discussions.
    • Their opinions carry significant weight, especially if they strongly advocate for or against you.
  • Senior Team Members (VPs, Directors, MDs):

    • They make the final call, but their decisions are often influenced by the feedback from junior team members.
    • Networking with seniors is important, but their exposure to your work may be limited compared to juniors.

Tips for a Large Group

  1. Prioritize Immediate Team:

    • Focus on building strong relationships with the people you work with directly. Their feedback will carry the most weight.
  2. Strategic Networking:

    • While it’s challenging to meet everyone in a large group, make an effort to connect with key senior members (e.g., MDs or Directors) who are involved in the decision-making process.
    • Use opportunities like team meetings, coffee chats, or networking events to introduce yourself and leave a positive impression.
  3. Leverage Mentors and Buddies:

    • Build a support network of mentors or buddies who can guide you and advocate for you during discussions.

By excelling in your work, being personable, and strategically networking with both junior and senior team members, you can maximize your chances of securing a return offer.

Sources: Getting an S&T Return Offer - A Survival Guide for Future Interns, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/who-exactly-determines-return-offers?customgpt=1, Advice for summer and return offer rate?, How the hell are return offer candidates going to be assessed this summer?, What am I expected to know as an incoming ER SA?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Basically your work product is the most important. People you directly work with (ANs, Assocs, sometimtes VPs) will write feedback on you. They will get an idea within first few weeks if you are good or not and are on track for return or borderline or not on track. This will get relayed to you in mid point review. Ultimately decision is made by seniors but this is mostly based on feedback from people you worked with. Obviously still meet with seniors but this is more table stakes and won't win you an offer. Personality is also table stakes and won't win you an offer, just be chill and personable and not a prick and you're fine.

 

Important and part of the overall feedback process. At my bank was basically if you were already on track then just had to not fuck it up but if you were borderline it needed to be good to pull you up.

 

At MS the analysts and associates go to a round-table then they go one by one on each intern and what everyone's thoughs are 

 

Cool, and are the expectations to have multiple people speak highly of you or is just being known for meeting the goals good enough?

 

Depends on your previous feedback. If you've only had good feedback and everyone said to recommend return offer they'll spend like 30 seconds on you and ask for any objections. For borderline candidates it's more of a longer discussion and having people going to bat for you helps. 

It's not like it's all decided on one day at the meeting. The team will basically already know who's getting on and who isn't and discussions are for borderline cases as mentioned or for people to add concerns/vouch for u if its not been mentioned.

 

Omnis qui et iusto in et nisi quibusdam. Molestias voluptas ut dolorem itaque laudantium dolor in. Ipsum quibusdam voluptates vel qui vel. Voluptatem rem quasi nisi amet.

Deserunt sed error sunt saepe nulla. Sit aut voluptatem velit aspernatur placeat error nemo. Sequi consequatur fugiat amet nesciunt reiciendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”