SA Return Offer
When it comes to end of internship discussions on who gets a return, what are the main factors? How does it get weighed between work and personality? I am in a group with quite a few people, so it would be hard to get to meet everyone personally. Are the more junior people the main ones deciding? Or should I also spend some time meeting the seniors?
When it comes to end-of-internship discussions about return offers, here’s what you need to know based on the most helpful WSO content:
Key Factors for Return Offers
Work Performance:
Personality and Fit:
Interaction with Colleagues:
Feedback and Advocacy:
Weighing Work vs. Personality
Who Decides?
Junior Team Members (Analysts and Associates):
Senior Team Members (VPs, Directors, MDs):
Tips for a Large Group
Prioritize Immediate Team:
Strategic Networking:
Leverage Mentors and Buddies:
By excelling in your work, being personable, and strategically networking with both junior and senior team members, you can maximize your chances of securing a return offer.
Sources: Getting an S&T Return Offer - A Survival Guide for Future Interns, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/who-exactly-determines-return-offers?customgpt=1, Advice for summer and return offer rate?, How the hell are return offer candidates going to be assessed this summer?, What am I expected to know as an incoming ER SA?
Bump
Basically your work product is the most important. People you directly work with (ANs, Assocs, sometimtes VPs) will write feedback on you. They will get an idea within first few weeks if you are good or not and are on track for return or borderline or not on track. This will get relayed to you in mid point review. Ultimately decision is made by seniors but this is mostly based on feedback from people you worked with. Obviously still meet with seniors but this is more table stakes and won't win you an offer. Personality is also table stakes and won't win you an offer, just be chill and personable and not a prick and you're fine.
how about the intern project?
Important and part of the overall feedback process. At my bank was basically if you were already on track then just had to not fuck it up but if you were borderline it needed to be good to pull you up.
At MS the analysts and associates go to a round-table then they go one by one on each intern and what everyone's thoughs are
Cool, and are the expectations to have multiple people speak highly of you or is just being known for meeting the goals good enough?
Depends on your previous feedback. If you've only had good feedback and everyone said to recommend return offer they'll spend like 30 seconds on you and ask for any objections. For borderline candidates it's more of a longer discussion and having people going to bat for you helps.
It's not like it's all decided on one day at the meeting. The team will basically already know who's getting on and who isn't and discussions are for borderline cases as mentioned or for people to add concerns/vouch for u if its not been mentioned.
Sed corrupti tempora dolor non nesciunt debitis quia. Dolorem ea eos sint id optio sequi necessitatibus. Nihil veritatis aliquam minus nesciunt necessitatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...