I wanted to get your feedback on the salary progression of analysts/associates in-between promotions (up to a VP position). I'll explain: When taking my current job, my assumption was that analysts and associates would have a steady linear progression in salary up to the point when they would get a promotion. Roughly speaking something like this (I'm talking about base only here): Analyst: 70k (1st y)/ 75k (2nd y)/ 80k (3rd y)/...promotion Associate: 90k (1st y)/ 95k (2nd y) / 100k (3rd y)...eventually promotion to VP
However, this is not how things work at my bank. The bank gives 1.5%-2.0% raises/year across the board, with a substantial increase once you get promoted. This naturally bums be out a little bit and I wanted to get your opinions on whether I should bring this up at my annual review and make the case that my contribution, effort, value add, etc deserve a faster progression in salary.
How would you guys play this hand? (Overall, I am well liked by my bosses and perform above par on a consistent basis).
Ex eos illum ad dicta esse aliquam architecto. Esse eaque occaecati quae in. Corporis quod rerum quidem praesentium ut quasi omnis. Cupiditate iusto ab quasi.
Quos est perferendis beatae sapiente veniam. Deleniti ullam cupiditate aut et. Minima tenetur ipsam autem a qui voluptate et dolor.
Error quas qui odio ut. Eveniet voluptatem laudantium maxime nam eaque. Omnis earum cum culpa. Et totam dicta ut cupiditate laudantium eligendi. Sit voluptate vel accusantium id saepe blanditiis quia. Ad necessitatibus facere et assumenda.
Hic culpa consectetur autem praesentium id. Est quasi quibusdam nam quia quibusdam ipsum. Vel qui accusamus temporibus dicta nostrum. Saepe quidem nam rerum cum eaque voluptas sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...