Senior to A1 Ratio
What is the typical MD/Director to A1 ratio you find at most coverage groups MM/BB? What’s normal?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +160 | UBS Tech layoff | 52 | 1d |
| +153 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 24 | 11h |
| +146 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 31 | 14h |
| +73 | Leaked Interview Questions to Recruiting Services | 39 | 4m |
| +59 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 27 | 12h |
| +58 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 17 | 19h |
| +37 | Quitting After First 4 months | 12 | 1d |
| +34 | MBB Pay Raises | 26 | 1d |
| +19 | Rothschild UK - Mining & Healthcare 2026 | 5 | 3d |
| +19 | Career Crossroads | 2 | 2d |
Career Resources
Based on the most helpful WSO content, the typical deal team structure in many coverage groups, whether in MM or BB, often includes 1 MD, 1 VP or Director, 1 Associate, and 1 Analyst. This suggests a 1:1 ratio of MD/Director to Analyst on a deal team. However, this can vary depending on the firm, group size, and deal flow.
Sources: First years- get your stuff together, Q&A: Non-finance major --> BB IB --> Director at $5B+ Multi-strat HF (in 6 years), Questions about VP/D/MD levels at investment banks, MM Investment Banking Outlook, BAML IB Groups (NYC)
EB: 2 analyst for every partner / MD
I’m at 0.3 analysts per md and directors is that normal? Have around 15 seniors in my group
Like it’s getting to the point where I just can’t be present on every deal and it makes me look bad, other analysts having this issue. Have been told to just be more “efficient” by staffer like problem is not even the amount of deals it’s just overlapping deadlines. I don’t have 8 arms I don’t know what to do
Not sure what the Director dynamic is but for MDs, that’s not normal unless they are unproductive. If a productive MD has at least 2 live deals going on, hard to imagine they’d staff each analyst on 6 live deals
JPM: ~5 analysts per MD+
Feel like in my coverage group it’s more like 3
Maybe I overshot by a few points. More like 4-4.5, but generally in my coverage we are a few MDs light compared to what we could have.
Dicta recusandae numquam ratione debitis ut consectetur. Possimus qui nam ullam ut qui sapiente aut. Nesciunt nostrum aut alias vero assumenda veritatis et explicabo. Et inventore ex quibusdam cum eaque non. Nisi qui doloribus eveniet suscipit odio sit vel.
Laboriosam modi assumenda blanditiis sit. Non tempore autem voluptas est in. Minus molestiae praesentium rem possimus doloribus et autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...