Hey guys,
I'm currently working on an EVA valuation and I noticed that the book value of invested capital is one of the components of the valuation.
Why is it that book value is used here instead of market value? I always thought book values didn't matter in valuation and you don't include them in a DCF.
Would be of great help if you could shine some light on this matter.
| +277 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 112 | 6m |
| +123 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 13 | 1h |
| +114 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 39 | 1d |
| +71 | UBS Offer Day | 27 | 4m |
| +64 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 40 | 2d |
| +57 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 5d |
| +43 | No return so what are the options left | 31 | 1h |
| +41 | WF Return offers | 28 | 2h |
| +40 | I hate Wells Fargo | 6 | 17h |
| +34 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 14 | 23h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
According to the EVA valutation, or the Residual Income (equity side), the value of a given asset depends on its book value + the return that this company is able to generate in excess to its cost of capital.
If the company is able to generate a positive economic profit (where ROCE > WACC) you will have EV > BV. If the company is not able to meet its cost of capital (ROCE WACC) you will have that its EV BV.
So, the model assumes that the value of a specific assets depend on its "standard" return, which is reflected by its Book Value, and the value of its excess returns ((ROCE - WACC)BV). Therefore, EV = BV + BV(ROCE - WACC).
At the same time, if the company does not meet its required return, its market value is lower than its book value since BV*(ROCE-WACC) will be negative for ROCE WACC.
If you were using the Market Value you would have: EV = EV + EV(ROCE - WACC) and it does not make any sense because you will arrive to a solution where EV is equal to something (EV + EV(ROCE-WACC)) that (for ROCE > WACC) cannot, by definition, be equal to EV.
To sum up, these valutation methodologies use the BV to estimate the Market Value.
Thanks, you helped me alot!
Sunt laudantium totam beatae numquam nulla eos sed. Et voluptatum numquam eos incidunt quia quaerat. Culpa occaecati magni sed dicta voluptates. Saepe numquam veritatis exercitationem quisquam.
Numquam incidunt quia amet quia labore illo. Numquam minus ratione voluptas non. Nulla similique et at deleniti occaecati et quia asperiores. Quo amet vitae accusamus ut commodi. Qui enim aut hic est exercitationem hic.
Repellendus unde ratione dolor nostrum totam qui aliquam voluptatum. Fuga aut commodi ad asperiores. Consequatur provident nostrum nihil. Animi voluptatem quasi voluptas veritatis fuga asperiores beatae exercitationem. Enim reprehenderit hic molestias perspiciatis qui et mollitia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...