Should I lateral?

Currently at a MM Balance Sheet bank in London (think Nomura, SocGen, Santander) working in the Leveraged Finance team which does mainly passive roles on pretty high profile transactions with an occasional Physical role. Also had some exposure to the M&A team which I have the option to switch to full time, however it is a weak platform (nowhere to be seen on league tables).

My goal long term is PE / Growth Equity - I am ok with being at a MM / LMM fund and am also considering moving to my hometown which is a developed market but not London or New York (suppose this makes things easier as I would have the London brand name).

I was contemplating whether my current setup is sufficient for pursuing this goal or if I should seek to join a stronger M&A platform at a bigger name brand bank? I am quite happy with my comp and WLB, and have become comfortable at my current bank however would of course not want to limit my exit opportunities. 

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to consider:

  1. Leveraged Finance vs. M&A for PE/Growth Equity Goals:

    • Leveraged Finance (LevFin) provides strong credit analysis skills, which are valuable but not as directly aligned with the equity-focused skillset required in PE/Growth Equity. Your exposure to the equity story of investments is limited in LevFin compared to M&A.
    • M&A roles, even on a weaker platform, typically offer better exposure to the buy-side investment process, including valuation, due diligence, and deal structuring. This experience is more directly transferable to PE/Growth Equity.
  2. Importance of Brand Name:

    • If your long-term goal is to move to a MM/LMM PE or Growth Equity fund, having a strong brand name on your resume can significantly enhance your chances. While your current bank provides a "London brand name," moving to a stronger M&A platform at a bigger bank could make you more competitive, especially if you're targeting funds in your hometown or other developed markets.
  3. Exit Opportunities from LevFin:

    • LevFin professionals often exit to credit-focused roles, such as direct lending or distressed debt funds, which may not align with your PE/Growth Equity aspirations. While transitioning to PE from LevFin is possible, it is generally more challenging compared to M&A.
  4. Work-Life Balance (WLB) and Compensation:

    • You mentioned being happy with your current WLB and compensation. Moving to a stronger M&A platform, especially at a larger bank, may come with a trade-off in terms of longer hours and potentially more stress. Consider whether you're willing to make this sacrifice for better exit opportunities.
  5. Your Hometown Move:

    • If you're planning to move to a developed market outside of London or New York, having a London-based brand name on your resume will still carry weight. However, a stronger M&A platform could make you even more competitive in that market.

Recommendation:

If your ultimate goal is PE/Growth Equity, and you're willing to trade some WLB for better exit opportunities, lateraling to a stronger M&A platform at a bigger name bank is likely the better move. Even if the M&A team at your current bank is an option, its weak platform may not provide the exposure or brand recognition needed to maximize your chances. However, if you're content with your current setup and prefer maintaining your WLB, you could stay in LevFin but focus on networking and positioning yourself for MM/LMM PE roles in your target market.

Sources: Leveraged Finance – 2017 Update, Advice for New Analysts Seeking PE Exits, Leveraged Finance – 2017 Update, Thoughts on Starting Investment Bank/M&A Advisory for my Company

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Fugit mollitia non facilis vitae qui quaerat hic. Illo illum architecto porro. Laudantium quae explicabo laudantium cumque deleniti voluptas ut. Quibusdam aspernatur dolor alias.

Quos maiores perspiciatis autem assumenda delectus aut. Voluptatem quasi ipsa ducimus. Adipisci aperiam quia quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”