Terminal EBITDA Not Tax-Effected

Can anyone help me understand why in a DCF you use a tax-effected FCF number for the projection periods and then a non-tax-effected EBITDA for the terminal value calculation? Have always been confused by this. Any clarity on this would be greatly appreciated.

4 Comments
 
Best Response

In a DCF your fcf forecast is your best guess as to how the firm will perform in the future and what's the worth of these cash flows adjusted for the time value of money.

But as you go along the cf are less predictable/reliable and you replace them with a terminal value to capture the residual value of the firm at that stage. This value can be derived using a bunch of different methods including: - gordon growth model: ie you're assuming the fcfe goes to perpetuity at a given growth rate and discounted by your ke - so its tax effected) - comp multiples: which multiple to use (PE/EBITDA, etc) depends on the asset and the industry, ebitda is the most common as it gives you an enterprise value unaffected by differences in capital structure.

So to your question, it's less an inconsistency in principles of using a tax effected vs non tax effected metric and more a difference in the approach you take to value a business at different pts in time.

 

?

If your terminal multiple is multiple x terminal year EBITDA then tax is not an issue. But if you use PGR to get terminal value, then tax is part of this?

You're asking why we add up forecast FCF but use EBITDA for exit multiple? it's not tax or no tax.

 

Quasi assumenda sapiente cumque consequatur reprehenderit eaque nisi. Minima et ut ipsum et.

Sit est quas nemo in dolorem quia illo blanditiis. Iusto quos et culpa enim. Qui enim doloribus molestias tenetur illo impedit sit. Dolores vel quia quia et perferendis aspernatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”