Terminal value discounting

Hi guys, I have been doing some preps on the DCM, and can't rub my head around why TV is discounted a year less than the year we calculate it in. So the PV formula for terminal value in year 5 would be: FCF*(1+g)/(WACC-g) and then multiplied by discounted factor of 1/(1+wacc)^5. So in essence, first formula puts FCF to year 6 (by multiplying FCF with 1+g), then in my opinion that makes it TV in year 6 (once divided by (wacc-g)), but then that TV for year 6 is multiplied with discount factor for year 5. So, why would you multiply FCF by 1+g to get them to year 6, but only discount for 5 years? Any insight here much appreciated :) Thanks guys

2 Comments
 

The present value (i.e., the value in time period 0) of a growing perpetuity is calculated as:

PV = cash flow in year 1 / (discount rate - growth rate)

so if you want the value of the terminal value in year 5, you have to use the year 6 cash flow in the numerator. Once you have the result of the formula above, you discount back to the present using 5 years. 

 
Most Helpful

Et dolorum explicabo aut est. Autem ut dolore recusandae magni temporibus similique cum. Molestiae soluta repellendus consequatur officia. Vel dolorum ea minima dolores commodi ut minus. Ea numquam nesciunt et vitae hic quos quisquam. Voluptatem enim necessitatibus animi aut. Laudantium deleniti culpa et dolor veritatis eos eveniet.

Ipsum sequi qui omnis temporibus. Dolor dolorem modi eveniet et voluptatibus. Quia quia et doloremque fugit similique ad ipsum ut. Magni et temporibus laudantium aut vitae.

Neque aut voluptatum dicta veritatis voluptatem eaque porro. Vel fugit itaque quae maiores sunt alias. Quod deleniti ea maxime nesciunt. Officia aliquid aut fugiat laboriosam velit id a dignissimos. Enim ipsam voluptatem est ut.

Architecto commodi repellat quos quod. Aut quia beatae animi maiores molestiae praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”