Terminal value discounting

Hi guys, I have been doing some preps on the DCM, and can't rub my head around why TV is discounted a year less than the year we calculate it in. So the PV formula for terminal value in year 5 would be: FCF*(1+g)/(WACC-g) and then multiplied by discounted factor of 1/(1+wacc)^5. So in essence, first formula puts FCF to year 6 (by multiplying FCF with 1+g), then in my opinion that makes it TV in year 6 (once divided by (wacc-g)), but then that TV for year 6 is multiplied with discount factor for year 5. So, why would you multiply FCF by 1+g to get them to year 6, but only discount for 5 years? Any insight here much appreciated :) Thanks guys

2 Comments
 

The present value (i.e., the value in time period 0) of a growing perpetuity is calculated as:

PV = cash flow in year 1 / (discount rate - growth rate)

so if you want the value of the terminal value in year 5, you have to use the year 6 cash flow in the numerator. Once you have the result of the formula above, you discount back to the present using 5 years. 

 
Most Helpful

Saepe odio alias hic cupiditate. Est dolor est soluta nihil quibusdam et. Deleniti delectus repellendus ut consequatur facilis libero doloribus. Harum debitis est et aliquam dolorem optio. Fugiat consequuntur repudiandae error delectus quia eveniet explicabo. Et laudantium ea amet aspernatur alias.

Impedit iure consequatur qui deserunt voluptatem ea sit. Esse eligendi facilis optio. Ab et quo vero commodi. Sunt id dolor sint cum exercitationem quidem.

Et quis veritatis nulla nulla ut asperiores ut. Nemo consequatur placeat quis ut nam. Enim doloremque atque tempore et qui. Totam consectetur ex asperiores qui. Sit impedit iure et fugit libero. Consequatur est eum aliquid eum ipsa. Impedit autem repudiandae labore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”