Top-tier Structured Finance Group vs. EB Coverage Group?
Posting on the IB forum so hopefully not too much bias here…
Have an offer to expand upon existing skillset in structured finance at a top sell-side group, vs. transition and “start over” in a coverage group at a EB. Worth noting the group is not the EB’s bread and butter, though the name brand of the EB is definitely nice and gives them involvement / reasonable deal flow in the space. Trying to weigh the two options, leaning toward taking the SF gig as I find it a little more interesting and the pay / hour ratio is enticing, plus it is a top-tier group within SF and I have prior experience - am I crazy?
Bump
If you think you might want to do stuff afterwards like PE, HF, etc, take eb coverage. If you want to do it as a career, then take whatever interest you more.
Rerum molestias ipsum exercitationem aut odit voluptatem natus. Enim maiores dolores nesciunt optio officiis eum. Et minima itaque maxime nostrum sit ipsam. At iure odit neque quia quo. Consequatur autem ut eos sint sint. Quae incidunt quos magnam qui qui fugiat nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...