Torch Partners (London) - Culture and Overview

Given that Torch seems to be hiring again and tends to run lean, I thought I’d share an honest perspective for the benefit of people interviewing there. Happy to hear other's people story too.

For context: I previously worked there and have seen things from the inside. I won’t disclose more for anonymity.

Dealflow

Dealflow is not bad but it ain't a deal machine, mostly LMM deals  (20 - 100m EV) with every now and then some bigger deal mostly in Digital infra:

  • Strongest vertical is digital infrastructure often alongside co-advisors
  • Some lower/mid-market software deals
  • Consumer software hasn’t been particularly active recently
  • Fintech had good momentum historically, but the main MD driving that vertical has left. A new MD has joined but yet to deliver so that’s a question mark

Overall, you will see some live processes and relatively decent mandates, but be expected to be constantly pitching anyway.

Culture

I’ll keep this short: In my experience, culture was the biggest challenge.

Externally, they portray themselves as the cool, modern boutique. In reality, it’s the opposite. And there is nothing worse than the external image sometimes feels different from the internal experience.

Culture is heavily driven by the CEO, who is a very intense, workaholic personality. He genuinely believes:

  • People should effectively be working around the clock
  • “The worst enemy of a deal is time"
  • Everything should have been done yesterday

He does not switch off (even on holiday, as he logs in at 4am his time to jump on useless weekly calls getting mocked by other MDs) and assumes nobody else should either. 

This creates unnecessary pressure, rushed work, stress and avoidable mistakes across the team (from Directors downward)

Micromanagement is real:

  • He is on every deal, creating bottlenecks as he needs to approve everything and further stress for him
  • Wants to be copied on almost every email (even junior-to-junior operational matters, don't ask me why)
  • Comments on everything (yup, logos, alignments, folder naming, email fonts, you name it)
  • Delegation trust is limited - as you can imagine from the above points

Interactions can sometimes become tense during high-pressure situations. Minor issues that in most firms would be handled calmly (e.g. a VDR addition or a document print) can trigger disproportionate reactions. There is a somewhat unusual physical intensity when he gets frustrated (pacing, raised voice, abrupt tone shifts) that honestly becomes almost comical after a while. Juniors often find themselves being shouted at for things that objectively are small.

Cherry on the cake: There have also been moments where he publicly quizzes MDs or seniors on the floor about sector knowledge in a way that feels awkward and theatrical.

Face time is absolutely a thing despite CEO denying it:

  • 5/5 days in the office
  • Sitting on the same floor as him = good optics
  • Different floor = less visibility
  • People (including Directors) rarely leave before he does as they fear it
  • If work is done early, some literally sneak out through the back entrance to avoid being seen leaving “too early.”

The symbolic “cool CEO” gesture is opening a non-alcoholic office beer at 7pm on a Friday which is somehow meant to signal progressive leadership.

Hours

Despite relatively mild dealflow and smaller deal size, hours are heavy / in-line with BBs.

Reasons:

  • Everything deserves a pitch.
  • Every model must be ultra granular even when it adds zero decision-making value leading to 400-line models for just a tiny revenue line because “detail is good.”

Because everything must be done “by yesterday,” expect frequent weekend work and regular friday dinner in the office as leaving ~10pm on a Friday is considered somewhat normal.

It’s not necessarily driven by live deal intensity it’s driven by internal pressure.

Churn

To anyone's surprise: High

You can see it on LinkedIn, though not everyone updates publicly. Rough estimate: There appeared to be relatively high turnover among junior staff alone with a total junior team of ~15 people max.

What to consider if you are in the process

  • If you thrive in high-pressure, high-control environments and don’t mind constant oversight, you may survive altho I am happy to bet you won't
  • If you value autonomy, trust, and rational workflow pacing think carefully and consider other options
  • The technical reps are there
  • The culture trade-off is real, not sure about the brand recognition and the deal flow 

Happy to help any of you in the process (within reason)

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a detailed breakdown of Torch Partners' culture and overview in London:

Deal Flow

  • Focus Areas: Primarily lower middle-market (LMM) deals with enterprise values between €20–100m. Occasionally, larger deals surface, especially in digital infrastructure.
  • Verticals:
    • Digital infrastructure is the strongest vertical, often involving co-advisors.
    • Lower/mid-market software deals are present, though consumer software has been less active recently.
    • Fintech had momentum historically, but the departure of the main MD driving this vertical has left a gap. A new MD has joined, but their impact remains uncertain.
  • Workload: While there are live processes and decent mandates, a significant portion of time is spent on constant pitching.

Culture

  • Leadership Style: The culture is heavily influenced by the CEO, described as an intense workaholic with a "work-around-the-clock" mentality. Key traits include:
    • Belief that "time is the worst enemy of a deal."
    • Micromanagement tendencies, including involvement in minor details (e.g., logos, email fonts) and requiring approval for almost everything.
    • Visible anger flare-ups over minor issues, creating a high-pressure environment.
    • Public quizzing of MDs and seniors, which can feel awkward and theatrical.
  • Face Time: Despite claims to the contrary, face time is a significant factor:
    • 5/5 days in the office are expected.
    • Employees often avoid leaving before the CEO to maintain "good optics."
    • Some juniors sneak out through the back entrance to avoid being seen leaving "too early."
  • Symbolic Gestures: The CEO's attempt to foster a "cool" culture includes gestures like opening a non-alcoholic beer at 7 PM on Fridays, which is perceived as superficial.

Hours

  • Workload: Despite moderate deal flow, hours are heavy and comparable to bulge brackets (BBs). This is driven by:
    • A culture of pitching everything.
    • Overly granular modeling requirements, even when unnecessary.
    • Internal pressure to complete tasks "by yesterday," leading to frequent weekend work and late Fridays (e.g., 10 PM finishes are normal).

Churn

  • Turnover: High turnover is evident, with an estimated 10–12 juniors leaving in the past year from a team of ~15 juniors. This aligns with the challenging culture and workload.

Considerations for Candidates

  • Pros:
    • Strong technical training and exposure to detailed modeling.
    • Decent deal flow in specific verticals like digital infrastructure.
  • Cons:
    • High-pressure, micromanaged environment with limited autonomy.
    • Heavy hours and a culture that prioritizes optics over well-being.
    • High turnover, indicating dissatisfaction among juniors.
  • Fit: If you thrive in high-pressure, high-control environments and prioritize technical skill-building over work-life balance, this could be a fit. However, if you value autonomy, trust, and a balanced workflow, it may be worth exploring other options.

Feel free to ask for further insights or advice!

Sources: Thoughts on Financial Technology Partners, WSO 2021 Investment Banking Work-Conditions Survey (Part 2/2), Thoma Bravo: Culture / Experience?, Strategy& Ex Employee - Q&A, Strategy& Ex Employee - Q&A

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Quaerat suscipit quam non magnam aut ut optio. Molestiae minus sequi at rerum et. Mollitia ut occaecati quia recusandae similique nihil. Est velit reprehenderit vero iure ut. Voluptatem sed quia consectetur.

Totam eveniet et modi quis ullam excepturi nobis. Et rem dolor sint ipsam est. Quis inventore accusamus veniam quod tenetur perferendis explicabo omnis. Adipisci qui ea vel nulla aliquam debitis facilis. Sed quaerat numquam dolores sit iste.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”