Tremendous difference in M&A fees among The BBs

hey guys this table is the Thomson Reuters 2011 Global M&A Completed Deals (Thomson Reuters Deals Intelligence)

         Rank Value   Advisory Fees (

MS 636, 1684 GS 631. 1802
JPM 509, 1574 BAML 387, 1143 Citi 367, 721 UBS 348, 1027 CS 337, 1148
DB 293, 853 Barcap 268, 764 Lazard 248, 688

Ive divided the rank value figures by 1K, and the advisory fees are reported in USDm. A couple of things that stand out from these numbers is that:

  1. Although UBS and CS completed fewer deals than other BBs, their advisory fees are still on par with some higher ranked BBs such as BAML and far greater than Citi.

  2. Citi, on the other hand stands at 5th place and still collected the lowest in fees out of all the BBs.

  3. Would the above 2 points imply that some BBs such as Citi have a deteriorating IBD business, and just lobby on most of the deals instead of actually providing financial advice to the clients? I know of course that Citi worked on Express-Medco 34 bn one and Lubrizols 9bn deals but other than that, it seems there is a lot of just getting deal-credting going at the firm just for the sake of the league tables. If this was not the case, then they should have net far more in M&A fees. On the other hand, some places such as UBS which we actually think are shitty might not be doing that bad.

Would love to hear some comments/views on this.

10 Comments
 
CoolacI do because there's a lot of bulge bracket bashing which goes on the forum, and it seems as if the stats dont confirm that.

A lot of the bashing isn't based solely on league table and fees. Lazard is last on that list and most people would work there over many of the BBs. Also, although BAML is fairly high it's name and bonuses still suck. Who knows if UBS and CS's IBD will still be around in a few years.

 
Best Response

This information basically confirms all the bashing that goes on here..people will continue to bash "lower tier" BB's such as UBS/CS/DB and continue to put GS/MS/JPM in their own category just because of the amount of their fees.

I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
 
tlynch5This information basically confirms all the bashing that goes on here..people will continue to bash "lower tier" BB's such as UBS/CS/DB and continue to put GS/MS/JPM in their own category just because of the amount of their fees.

ok fyi citi is 5th in completed deals yet collected the lowest in fees. would u call it a lower tier bb then?

 
Coolac
tlynch5This information basically confirms all the bashing that goes on here..people will continue to bash "lower tier" BB's such as UBS/CS/DB and continue to put GS/MS/JPM in their own category just because of the amount of their fees.

ok fyi citi is 5th in completed deals yet collected the lowest in fees. would u call it a lower tier bb then?

I don't want to put any of these firms in a category..they're all BB's to me and most people would be lucky to work at any of these firms. Great information btw.

I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
 

CS is not lower tier BB, what are you smoking...

I don't understand the chart in the OP - is that value of completed deals? Because what you talk about in your bulletpoints 1-3 are completely different from what the chart's saying if the chart is advisory fees.

 
goldman in da houseCS is not lower tier BB, what are you smoking...

I don't understand the chart in the OP - is that value of completed deals? Because what you talk about in your bulletpoints 1-3 are completely different from what the chart's saying if the chart is advisory fees.

Yes the numbers on the left are the value of completed deals, and the numbers on the right are advisory fees. It's a little bit misleading if some banks have completed more mandates than others such as Citi completing more deals than 5 other firms below it (UBS,CS, Barcap, DB) yet taking a very small amount home. seems as if the company has lobbied more to get its name on the deal teams. does that make sense? if that is the case, it doesnt say very well about the company's IBD operations.

 

Unde fuga omnis reiciendis eaque animi corporis voluptatem. Perspiciatis et quas neque repudiandae amet neque. Id cumque voluptatem repudiandae a quisquam similique asperiores. Recusandae autem explicabo vero animi quam perferendis. Ut porro voluptatem ducimus pariatur dignissimos. Qui est autem laborum facere corrupti.

Hic aut sed et eum sit commodi. Laudantium impedit porro eum neque.

Blanditiis facere consectetur non ipsum ut est magnam. Nesciunt iusto et rem aliquam sed. Enim sunt nesciunt saepe molestiae dolorum rerum. Esse et quia mollitia voluptas et sit non. Fugit ut et fugiat.

Quia aut nobis cumque voluptatibus at. Architecto impedit molestiae doloribus sapiente dignissimos. Consequatur harum in quibusdam impedit. Est blanditiis illo molestias dolores id. Et impedit officia rerum atque est quia vitae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”