GiantsFan2011for best product groups go to sponsors and lev fin.
Not anymore @ UBS - fsg/lev fin drastically downsized; they lost their head of leveraged finance (forgot his name --- think he went to... citi?) and they aren't really on very many deals anymore. They still do well in M&A, however.
GiantsFan2011for best product groups go to sponsors and lev fin.
Not anymore @ UBS - fsg/lev fin drastically downsized; they lost their head of leveraged finance (forgot his name --- think he went to... citi?) and they aren't really on very many deals anymore. They still do well in M&A, however.
Chris Abbate left to Citi, and a significant portion of that group from VP+ jumped ship, but it's still a solid group. Lev Fin/Sponsors definitely one of the best groups at UBS.
Personally, UBS is just a shitty bank overall.. If i were you, I would look at getting offers elsewhere IMMEDIATELY!
C'mon man they freaking lost $2B recently so they're probably not getting bonuses... If Industrials & TMT are top, can you say. . . . . NO DEAL FLOW! GS, MS, and JPM obviously run those industries..
flyguy23Personally, UBS is just a shitty bank overall.. If i were you, I would look at getting offers elsewhere IMMEDIATELY!
C'mon man they freaking lost $2B recently so they're probably not getting bonuses... If Industrials & TMT are top, can you say. . . . . NO DEAL FLOW! GS, MS, and JPM obviously run those industries..
It is what it is
...Because if you dont work for GS/MS/JPM you get no deals?
They've been advising on several of the major M&A and IPOs in the last months.
As one reader above said, it's probably better not to be in S&T right now, but IBD is set to grow and expand.
UBS has had a bad history, but with their balance sheet, their clients and relationships, and these recent developments, the future of their IBD division looks very bright and can only go uphill.
To answer the OP's question: i've been told that TMT and industrials are indeed the better groups.
JWR34Always been told that M&A, LevFin/Sponsors, TMT and Industrials are the best groups.
M&A isn't so much because 1. the group is incredibly overstaffed (just took 13 new first years in 2011 with a full workload's worth of work for about 7...) and 2. a lot of the industry groups execute and do models inhouse (FIG, part of Industrials, part of Real Estate, possibly more) so M&A really isn't the best place to be. If a product group is your focus, stick with Lev Fin/Sponsors.
JWR34Always been told that M&A, LevFin/Sponsors, TMT and Industrials are the best groups.
M&A isn't so much because 1. the group is incredibly overstaffed (just took 13 new first years in 2011 with a full workload's worth of work for about 7...) and 2. a lot of the industry groups execute and do models inhouse (FIG, part of Industrials, part of Real Estate, possibly more) so M&A really isn't the best place to be. If a product group is your focus, stick with Lev Fin/Sponsors.
I heard from someone in industrials that corp fin @ UBS follows typical bank structure - focus is on origination (i.e. pitching).
Also reiterate my last post - lev fin/sponsors at UBS is not the booming business it used to be. They have lost significant staffing and deal volume.
See chart here - the loan fees (blue, at the far right) are a decent proxy for sponsor / lbo financing as a % of total fees. The strong sponsors groups are at JPM, BAML, Citi, and Wells Fargo (i.e. all of the actual deposit-taking banks -- also CS is better than it looks here):
Consumers is definitely one of the weaker industry groups in UBS, as people have stated, Industrials and TMT are very solid and Healthcare and Real Estate are not bad either, although Real Estate is a total sweatshop.
no, LBO loans are a subset of leveraged loans. "leveraged loan" just means non-investment grade.
for instance, the 10 biggest lev loans in 2011 were all refinancings for public companies. Wells Fargo does a lot of those sorts of things, which is why they place highly in the league table you posted
Ullam quod ex velit sint quidem laboriosam natus dicta. Numquam reiciendis sapiente provident quia mollitia veritatis nisi. Ab aspernatur quisquam qui itaque explicabo impedit ad. Rerum veritatis sunt quam tempora labore. Nostrum tempore ipsa fuga. Facere ex praesentium deserunt autem voluptas blanditiis qui.
Eum provident reiciendis est illum dolor odit. Voluptatibus qui non qui voluptates. Molestias et inventore pariatur et modi asperiores.
Pariatur occaecati provident dolorem distinctio. Consequatur ratione velit consequatur tenetur ut et tempore expedita. Cumque qui ut sequi natus consequatur. Eum repellat accusamus aut tenetur libero nostrum consequatur.
Quod culpa quam dolores dolorem quos rerum. Et non aut fugit corporis quia eum. Quo quia et error debitis animi sed numquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits?
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
industrials
its eh, TMT and Industrials are the best at ubs.
for best product groups go to sponsors and lev fin.
Not anymore @ UBS - fsg/lev fin drastically downsized; they lost their head of leveraged finance (forgot his name --- think he went to... citi?) and they aren't really on very many deals anymore. They still do well in M&A, however.
But I agree with previous posters - UBS is to be avoided if you have other offers. A lot of uncertainty about their future in the US (http://www.rttnews.com/1764386/ubs-to-downsize-investment-bank-focus-on…). Comp has not been good in recent years (this has been a recurring theme, lots of people leaving as a result - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527023044598045772826927365759…). Culturally, they have always been on the less favorable end as well (sweatshop, unappreciative, etc).
Chris Abbate left to Citi, and a significant portion of that group from VP+ jumped ship, but it's still a solid group. Lev Fin/Sponsors definitely one of the best groups at UBS.
Personally, UBS is just a shitty bank overall.. If i were you, I would look at getting offers elsewhere IMMEDIATELY! C'mon man they freaking lost $2B recently so they're probably not getting bonuses... If Industrials & TMT are top, can you say. . . . . NO DEAL FLOW! GS, MS, and JPM obviously run those industries..
It is what it is
To be fair though, UBS sales and trading IS getting destroyed, but if you're an IBD analyst, you should be ok (job>no job).
http://dealbreaker.com/2012/02/ubs-hitches-its-wagon-to-bear-stearns-al…
http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-21/ubs-turning-whistleblower-i…
http://dealbreaker.com/2012/02/bonus-watch-12-is-ubs-trying-to-tell-us-…
http://dealbreaker.com/2012/02/bonus-watch-12-ubs-asia/
http://dealbreaker.com/2012/02/bonus-watch-12-ubs/
The NKI?
don't talk about stuff you do not understand. Dealbreaker is using UBS to have someone to bash and laugh at in order to attract readers.
UBS IBD is completely back on track.
They've been advising on several of the major M&A and IPOs in the last months. As one reader above said, it's probably better not to be in S&T right now, but IBD is set to grow and expand.
Also, they've literally just hired Andrea Orcel (one of the biggest rainmakers in the world) to co-head the Investment Banking Division (everything that's Corporate Finance and advisory).
UBS has had a bad history, but with their balance sheet, their clients and relationships, and these recent developments, the future of their IBD division looks very bright and can only go uphill.
To answer the OP's question: i've been told that TMT and industrials are indeed the better groups.
^ Just being facetious, what you've said is true.
Always been told that M&A, LevFin/Sponsors, TMT and Industrials are the best groups.
M&A isn't so much because 1. the group is incredibly overstaffed (just took 13 new first years in 2011 with a full workload's worth of work for about 7...) and 2. a lot of the industry groups execute and do models inhouse (FIG, part of Industrials, part of Real Estate, possibly more) so M&A really isn't the best place to be. If a product group is your focus, stick with Lev Fin/Sponsors.
I heard from someone in industrials that corp fin @ UBS follows typical bank structure - focus is on origination (i.e. pitching).
Also reiterate my last post - lev fin/sponsors at UBS is not the booming business it used to be. They have lost significant staffing and deal volume.
See chart here - the loan fees (blue, at the far right) are a decent proxy for sponsor / lbo financing as a % of total fees. The strong sponsors groups are at JPM, BAML, Citi, and Wells Fargo (i.e. all of the actual deposit-taking banks -- also CS is better than it looks here):
http://markets.ft.com/investmentBanking/tablesAndTrends.asp
Consumers is definitely one of the weaker industry groups in UBS, as people have stated, Industrials and TMT are very solid and Healthcare and Real Estate are not bad either, although Real Estate is a total sweatshop.
no, LBO loans are a subset of leveraged loans. "leveraged loan" just means non-investment grade.
for instance, the 10 biggest lev loans in 2011 were all refinancings for public companies. Wells Fargo does a lot of those sorts of things, which is why they place highly in the league table you posted
delete
TMT is apparently good. However, I've heard that you are going to be killed as an analyst.
so... FSLF or M&A?
What about their power group?
Ullam quod ex velit sint quidem laboriosam natus dicta. Numquam reiciendis sapiente provident quia mollitia veritatis nisi. Ab aspernatur quisquam qui itaque explicabo impedit ad. Rerum veritatis sunt quam tempora labore. Nostrum tempore ipsa fuga. Facere ex praesentium deserunt autem voluptas blanditiis qui.
Eum provident reiciendis est illum dolor odit. Voluptatibus qui non qui voluptates. Molestias et inventore pariatur et modi asperiores.
Pariatur occaecati provident dolorem distinctio. Consequatur ratione velit consequatur tenetur ut et tempore expedita. Cumque qui ut sequi natus consequatur. Eum repellat accusamus aut tenetur libero nostrum consequatur.
Quod culpa quam dolores dolorem quos rerum. Et non aut fugit corporis quia eum. Quo quia et error debitis animi sed numquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...