VP->D Promotion Evaluation Criteria
I'm trying to get a better understanding of how people make the jump from VP to Director. Are you primarily evaluated on how well you executed as a VP? Or is it more looking at your potential to bring in revenue as a Director (eventually as an MD)? Are you expected to have proof points of new clients you've brought to the firm during your VP years? I'm interested in responses on the coverage side, less concerned about product groups that are more execution focused.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, the promotion from VP to Director is a significant transition and is evaluated on a mix of execution performance and demonstrated potential to bring in revenue. Here's a breakdown of the key factors:
Execution as a VP:
Transition to a Relationship/Sales Role:
Revenue Generation Potential:
Self-Awareness and Competence:
Networking and Relationship Building:
In summary, while strong execution as a VP is essential, the promotion to Director is heavily influenced by your ability to demonstrate potential for revenue generation, relationship building, and strategic thinking. Starting to show proof points of sourcing and client development during your VP years can significantly strengthen your case for promotion.
Believe it’s effectively a rubber stamp at most banks similar to VP promote. Haven’t seen many VP4s/VP5s
Don’t assume rubber stamp. Basically you need to demonstrate you have the capacity to engage with clients on strategic and financing topics in a lead role. Don’t need to have any dollars to your name on scorecard (I doubt you even have one at VP). Boils down to do your group heads see a calling officer in you.
Ok that's helpful, so it's more about showing that you engage well with clients, are able to be thoughtful on calls, bring ideas to the table, etc, rather than actually having brought in clients?
Assuming this is a bulge bracket, yes. Think being the go to person on a few commercial banking smaller accounts, the person who owns the corp dev VP relationship for a mid cap name, and who can lead large chunks of a variety of topics with large caps / bake offs / etc.
Would it be different for EBs? Thanks!
Don’t have experience at an EB. I suspect there will be more emphasis on owning relationships within a target client rather than pulling in new mandates. However cultivating new relationships within smaller names could be part of equation depending on how the firm is set up to allow for capacity for VPs to do independent calling.
Dicta velit aut natus delectus consequuntur corrupti. Totam dolores molestiae repudiandae aliquid non recusandae. Consequuntur distinctio pariatur accusamus et. Nulla omnis quos odit veniam amet reprehenderit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...