VP->D Promotion Evaluation Criteria

I'm trying to get a better understanding of how people make the jump from VP to Director. Are you primarily evaluated on how well you executed as a VP? Or is it more looking at your potential to bring in revenue as a Director (eventually as an MD)? Are you expected to have proof points of new clients you've brought to the firm during your VP years? I'm interested in responses on the coverage side, less concerned about product groups that are more execution focused.

8 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the promotion from VP to Director is a significant transition and is evaluated on a mix of execution performance and demonstrated potential to bring in revenue. Here's a breakdown of the key factors:

  1. Execution as a VP:

    • As a VP, your ability to quarterback deals end-to-end is critical. This includes managing associates, ensuring deliverables are top-notch, and making the MD's life easier by handling pitch materials and other responsibilities efficiently.
    • However, execution alone is not enough to make the jump to Director. While it's a baseline expectation, the focus shifts towards your ability to contribute to the firm's revenue generation.
  2. Transition to a Relationship/Sales Role:

    • Good VPs recognize the need to start transitioning from a pure execution role to a relationship-building and sales-oriented role. This includes sourcing deals, developing a network, and thinking strategically about new verticals or opportunities for the group.
    • Proof points of new clients or relationships you've cultivated during your VP years can be a strong indicator of your potential as a Director.
  3. Revenue Generation Potential:

    • Directors are expected to bring in meaningful revenue for the firm. While you may not be judged solely on your ability to source deals as a VP, demonstrating that you can contribute to the firm's bottom line is crucial.
    • This could involve showing early signs of sourcing capabilities, such as identifying potential clients, building relationships, or contributing to deal origination efforts.
  4. Self-Awareness and Competence:

    • Advancing to Director requires a high level of self-awareness, competence, and experience. Firms look for individuals who can take on more responsibility, think big picture, and eventually transition into the MD role.
  5. Networking and Relationship Building:

    • Developing your own network and having tangible results to show for it is a key differentiator. This includes building relationships with clients, junior executives, and other stakeholders who could become valuable contacts in the future.

In summary, while strong execution as a VP is essential, the promotion to Director is heavily influenced by your ability to demonstrate potential for revenue generation, relationship building, and strategic thinking. Starting to show proof points of sourcing and client development during your VP years can significantly strengthen your case for promotion.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Don’t assume rubber stamp. Basically you need to demonstrate you have the capacity to engage with clients on strategic and financing topics in a lead role. Don’t need to have any dollars to your name on scorecard (I doubt you even have one at VP). Boils down to do your group heads see a calling officer in you. 

 

Assuming this is a bulge bracket, yes. Think being the go to person on a few commercial banking smaller accounts, the person who owns the corp dev VP relationship for a mid cap name, and who can lead large chunks of a variety of topics with large caps / bake offs / etc. 

 

Don’t have experience at an EB. I suspect there will be more emphasis on owning relationships within a target client rather than pulling in new mandates.  However cultivating new relationships within smaller names could be part of equation depending on how the firm is set up to allow for capacity for VPs to do independent calling. 

 

Dicta velit aut natus delectus consequuntur corrupti. Totam dolores molestiae repudiandae aliquid non recusandae. Consequuntur distinctio pariatur accusamus et. Nulla omnis quos odit veniam amet reprehenderit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”