SENIOR BANKERS: Whale hunting vs. volume work at the senior level

Curious to hear if any senior bankers have insight into whale hunting for mega deals at a BB/EB vs. doing a higher volume of deals at a MM. I’d appreciate any info you can provide. Here are a few questions to help guide the conversation:

  1. Do the types of deals you do affect your lifestyle/WLB?

  2. Do seniors at a BB/EB specialize in just whale hunting or are they open to doing sub $1B deals in between chasing mega-cap mandates?

  3. What are some of the upsides and downsides to solely chasing after mega deals?

  4. What are some of the upsides and downsides to churning out MM sponsor sellsides?

  5. Do the economics of the type of bank your at (BB/EB/MM) factor into what deals you chase?

  6. How would you compare and contrast BD work/relationship building at public companies vs. sponsors/portcos vs. founder owned private companies?

  7. Does your frequency of travel differ based on the types of deals you do?

  8. Do specific types of deal require more prerequisite connections from undergrad, b-school, etc?

  9. If you're a junior MD/fresh Director at a bank known for whale hunting, what's expected of you when you first begin to build your book of business? Do you start down-market and work your way up? Do you get a few accounts handed to you by more senior producers?

 

Hey Incoming Analyst in CorpDev, what a lonely thread. I'm here since nobody responded ...so maybe one of these discussions will help:

More suggestions...

Fingers crossed that one of those helps you.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

My perspective:

1: No significant difference by deal type. There are laid back people and psychos everywhere. Anything public market facing will be more volatile (mostly BB). MM more of a consistent pain given larger number of txns.

2: BB/EB MDs absolutely will chase sub $1bn mandates.

3: Upsides are obvious - one txn can result in a $100mm+ fee for bank. Depending on model, $20-40mm bonus for banker.

4: Upside more consistent fee performance (portfolio approach). Less volatile WLB. Downside to smaller transactions is generally less sophisticated management teams, sponsors, lawyers - at upper end of MM generally not an issue. Smaller deals, smaller fees so make up with volume or lower paycheck

5: I might be miss understanding the question - but senior people at BB or EBs aren’t waking up every day and deciding between mega deals or MM deals. The roles are specialized earlier and the relationships / spheres of influence don’t translate. Economics matter - firms have fee minimums or at least guidelines

6: Sorry, didn’t understand question

7: The more deals you’re chasing, the more you’re traveling, regardless of size. Given that, MM bankers tend to travel more

8: No, not really

9: There is no specific answer for this - and will vary across firms and groups. Sponsor-driven / flow-based shops have more defined path. You don’t really wake up as a fresh MD at BB or EB and decide you only want to chase whales. To only chase whales you generally need: 15+ years of repeat and refrenceable clients, serious Board relationships, among other things. The path there can be SSDs of all sorts. But you should have a plan and track record before you make MD. At end of day it’s mostly about fees tied to you. The more senior you get the less SSDs you have to do…and apex predators end up only whale hunting.

Lastly - the lines aren’t as defined as the questions imply. I’m in coverage and focus on M&A and my competitors span BB, MM, and EB.

 

Reprehenderit corporis dolores nemo quis aut nobis. Tenetur non rerum repellat voluptas. Qui qui voluptas tempore.

Doloribus magni nostrum quia quis. Aut distinctio quos quam voluptatum rerum in dolores voluptate. Possimus cumque ea quaerat. Id tempora soluta odio nulla. Aut culpa non quaerat dolorum enim id voluptatem. Et ducimus porro quia placeat voluptate.

Voluptas voluptatem et molestias et consequatur consequatur. Atque voluptas minus ipsam quisquam. Dignissimos quia velit doloribus facere consequatur laudantium sed. Ut itaque placeat a aliquid voluptatem nesciunt ratione. Odio modi et voluptatum consequatur aliquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”