Enormous difference. Typically the coadvisor(s) don’t do shit. Maybe the MD from the coadvisor will be looped into some CIP review calls or something, but if you’re coadvising you’re not running point on any material creation or diligence.
This, and sometimes the MD's across banks will split up outreach based on relationships. These are actually pretty fun calls to join, a true battle of egos.
M&A co-advisor is generally more relaxed than co-bookrunners from a capital markets perspective (IPO, ECM, LevFin, etc.) where all firms involved are going to be dialing for dollars to secure enough money for the client. M&A co-advisors are often a way of spreading the fees across multiple banks who have provided advice or helped the company over the years. Having a co-advisor is also often a cheap way of “tying up” a bank so that they can’t use their knowledge to represent buyers on the other side, which could give buyers the advantage if the bank is already really smart on the business. Generally a co-advisory mandate means that the MDs will still be working hard, but the analysts and associates will not work so hard. It’s a very different beast which is less deliverable oriented and more strategically oriented.
Ut libero qui eum aut sapiente tempora. Labore aut ut ex nemo dicta.
Incidunt molestiae sint tempore nostrum. Facilis et omnis accusamus aut architecto quam reiciendis. Reprehenderit voluptatum non ad est in sit harum ratione. Est saepe dolorem animi.
Est vel dolores aut iusto aut quae mollitia. Numquam nostrum labore aut dicta autem quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Bump
Bump
bump
Enormous difference. Typically the coadvisor(s) don’t do shit. Maybe the MD from the coadvisor will be looped into some CIP review calls or something, but if you’re coadvising you’re not running point on any material creation or diligence.
This, and sometimes the MD's across banks will split up outreach based on relationships. These are actually pretty fun calls to join, a true battle of egos.
M&A co-advisor is generally more relaxed than co-bookrunners from a capital markets perspective (IPO, ECM, LevFin, etc.) where all firms involved are going to be dialing for dollars to secure enough money for the client. M&A co-advisors are often a way of spreading the fees across multiple banks who have provided advice or helped the company over the years. Having a co-advisor is also often a cheap way of “tying up” a bank so that they can’t use their knowledge to represent buyers on the other side, which could give buyers the advantage if the bank is already really smart on the business. Generally a co-advisory mandate means that the MDs will still be working hard, but the analysts and associates will not work so hard. It’s a very different beast which is less deliverable oriented and more strategically oriented.
Ut libero qui eum aut sapiente tempora. Labore aut ut ex nemo dicta.
Incidunt molestiae sint tempore nostrum. Facilis et omnis accusamus aut architecto quam reiciendis. Reprehenderit voluptatum non ad est in sit harum ratione. Est saepe dolorem animi.
Est vel dolores aut iusto aut quae mollitia. Numquam nostrum labore aut dicta autem quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...