What is the difference between an undergrad target and super-target uni in the UK for IB?
I've been seeing online in forums that, for IB, there are distinctions between super-target unis (Oxbridge, LSE, maybe Imperial?) and target unis (UCL, Warwick). I wanted to know if there are any actual material/outcome differences between these two tiers of unis for London IB recruiting or if this is just some prestige ranking thing. Also, if there are meaningful differences between these universities, then what are they?
When it comes to investment banking (IB) recruitment in the UK, the distinction between "super-target" and "target" universities is not just about prestige but also about the level of recruitment focus and opportunities available. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:
Super-Target Universities (e.g., Oxbridge, LSE, Imperial)
Target Universities (e.g., UCL, Warwick)
Material Differences
Conclusion
The distinction between super-target and target universities does have material differences in terms of recruitment opportunities, alumni networks, and access to events. However, students from both tiers can break into IB with the right combination of networking, internships, and preparation. The key is leveraging the resources available at your university and being proactive in building connections within the industry.
Sources: UK Target Universities Discussion Thread, Comprehensive List of Target Schools for Investment Banking, What are the Strongest Non-Target Schools for Undergrad Recruitment?, Investment Banking University Recruiting Report – 7 Key Takeaways
What’s super target?
Oxbridge and LSE apparently. But, I am not sure whether the super-target tier is meaningful or just a prestige ranking, especially when compared to the targets in the UK. If it is meaningful, I just want to know what the material differences are.
Basically no difference. Actually I'd argue that UCL/Warwick recruit equally if not better than some of the super targets. I study at Oxbridge and it's kinda disappointing how school name doesn't matter at all in finance. The kids at UCL/KCL/Warwick/etc. have a culture for grinding and working hard on their careers whereas kids at Oxbridge mainly focus on academics. Just the general culture at Oxbridge for finance recruiting sucks and compared to schools like LSE.
What I'm trying to say is that if you can't get into high finance from a school like UCL the problem is you and not the school. If you put in an equal amount of effort at both Oxbridge and UCL you will be able to get into high finance.
Oh damn I didn't realize that. I assumed Oxbridge would have the in-built prestige advantage but maybe this is just the warped perception I got from my sixth form classmates.
Absolutely no difference
PATANGA WALA
Est molestiae quo ut ut. Autem ab est quo et pariatur quam. Dicta eligendi quia reiciendis repellat ut. Maxime quis et ipsum voluptatum fuga ex. Recusandae a minima nulla et.
Id sapiente deleniti qui voluptates. Odit esse nihil ab molestiae nihil recusandae animi. Optio laborum illum ea aut quia voluptatibus similique.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...