What is the difference between an undergrad target and super-target uni in the UK for IB?

I've been seeing online in forums that, for IB, there are distinctions between super-target unis (Oxbridge, LSE, maybe Imperial?) and target unis (UCL, Warwick). I wanted to know if there are any actual material/outcome differences between these two tiers of unis for London IB recruiting or if this is just some prestige ranking thing. Also, if there are meaningful differences between these universities, then what are they?

8 Comments
 

When it comes to investment banking (IB) recruitment in the UK, the distinction between "super-target" and "target" universities is not just about prestige but also about the level of recruitment focus and opportunities available. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content:

Super-Target Universities (e.g., Oxbridge, LSE, Imperial)

  1. Recruitment Focus: These universities are heavily targeted by all major investment banks, including bulge bracket and elite boutique firms. They often have the strongest representation in IB recruitment.
  2. On-Campus Presence: Banks frequently host networking events, workshops, and on-campus interviews at these institutions, making it easier for students to connect with recruiters and alumni.
  3. Alumni Network: Super-targets tend to have a larger and more influential alumni base in IB, which can be a significant advantage for networking and referrals.
  4. Perception: These schools are often perceived as producing the "best and brightest," which can give candidates a slight edge during the application process.

Target Universities (e.g., UCL, Warwick)

  1. Recruitment Focus: While still targeted by many banks, the level of recruitment activity may not be as intense as at super-targets. Some banks may focus more on regional or specific offices.
  2. On-Campus Presence: Target universities may have fewer on-campus events compared to super-targets, requiring students to put in more effort to attend events at other schools or network externally.
  3. Alumni Network: While still strong, the alumni network in IB may not be as extensive or influential as that of super-target universities.
  4. Perception: These schools are still highly regarded, but candidates may need to work harder to stand out compared to their super-target peers.

Material Differences

  • Networking Opportunities: Super-targets provide more direct access to recruiters and alumni through on-campus events, which can streamline the recruitment process.
  • Competition: While both tiers are competitive, super-target students may face slightly less competition for IB roles due to the higher volume of opportunities available to them.
  • Effort Required: Students from target universities may need to rely more on external networking and cold outreach to secure interviews, whereas super-target students often have more structured pathways.

Conclusion

The distinction between super-target and target universities does have material differences in terms of recruitment opportunities, alumni networks, and access to events. However, students from both tiers can break into IB with the right combination of networking, internships, and preparation. The key is leveraging the resources available at your university and being proactive in building connections within the industry.

Sources: UK Target Universities Discussion Thread, Comprehensive List of Target Schools for Investment Banking, What are the Strongest Non-Target Schools for Undergrad Recruitment?, Investment Banking University Recruiting Report – 7 Key Takeaways

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Basically no difference. Actually I'd argue that UCL/Warwick recruit equally if not better than some of the super targets. I study at Oxbridge and it's kinda disappointing how school name doesn't matter at all in finance. The kids at UCL/KCL/Warwick/etc. have a culture for grinding and working hard on their careers whereas kids at Oxbridge mainly focus on academics. Just the general culture at Oxbridge for finance recruiting sucks and compared to schools like LSE

What I'm trying to say is that if you can't get into high finance from a school like UCL the problem is you and not the school. If you put in an equal amount of effort at both Oxbridge and UCL you will be able to get into high finance.

 

Est molestiae quo ut ut. Autem ab est quo et pariatur quam. Dicta eligendi quia reiciendis repellat ut. Maxime quis et ipsum voluptatum fuga ex. Recusandae a minima nulla et.

Id sapiente deleniti qui voluptates. Odit esse nihil ab molestiae nihil recusandae animi. Optio laborum illum ea aut quia voluptatibus similique.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”