What is the difference between the Board of Directors and the Special Committee

Noticed when skimming some decks that some are addressed to the Special Committee, others to the Board of Directors with the remaining being simply Discussion Materials. Is there any difference between these titles or do they all share the same meaning?

My thinking is that some decks are prepared for ("The Company"), of which these decks are not pitches as they contain the full suite of valuations. Other decks are presented to potential buyers, be it financial sponsors or strategics. 

Does the term "Special Committee" refer to that only of The Company's? Does the Board of Directors also refer to that of The Company's?

Also, are the materials sent to potential buyers presentations or CIMs (like word docs instead of ppts)

cheers

6 Comments
 

Not an expert, but in my limited experience, special committees are created ad hoc when the company is evaluating a transaction that could - or even appears that it could - favor one or more members of the board more than, or at the direct expense of, the rest of the shareholders. Needless to say, any board members who would disproportinately benefit from a contemplated transaction (related party transaction, go-private, etc.) are excluded from the special committee. Classic example is an LBO where the CEO, who presumably is a board member, would remain the CEO of the company under private equity ownership, and get loaded up with stock options in the now private company. S/he has an incentive to sell the company for a low price (=low strike price on his/her options), which conflicts with his/her responsibility to maximize value for current shareholders.

 

Special or independent committees typically consist of independent directors (no shareholding or material financial interests in the business) formed to represent the interests of minority shareholders.

Hypothetically, think about a company with a majority shareholder and a tiny tiny float, e.g., majority holder owns 90%, public shareholders own the other 10%. All rules aside, and again super simplistically, if an offer came in to acquire the company at a 50% discount to share price, theoretically the majority holder holds all the cards with 90% of the voting shares. The role of an SC is to represent the interests of the minority 10%.

In the case of an M&A transaction, an SC would be formed and they would retain "independent" advisors to for example, opine on the fairness of the deal from a financial point of view to shareholders, which is the fairness opinion. The SC will take these opinions and views from financial, legal etc. advisors and make a recommendation to the Board in support of or against the deal. The Board then votes to send the deal to shareholders.

The other aspect of SC and fairness opinions are to cover their asses legally. Simplistically, If say a shareholder sues the Board because they deem the terms to be unfair or whatever, Board can point to a process whereby an independent committee with no material financial stake in the deal evaluated the terms and value considering the opinions of independent advisors.

 

Super informative, appreciate it.

Noticed that some decks are titled, "Presentation to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors". So is it possible that the SC is on The Board?

 

Are there any differences between special committee assignments and fairness opinions? It seems like the only difference is that the audience of the fairness opinion is the entire Board and shareholders, whereas the the audience of the special committee recommendation is just the special committee (i.e., subset of the Board). If this is the case, then the company would still need to get a fairness opinion (even after the special committee recommendation). Which is more lucrative to the bank from a fee perspective?

 
Most Helpful

Velit eos voluptatem cumque dolores qui aspernatur. Voluptatem id fuga rerum debitis. Qui ipsam facilis suscipit distinctio. Alias non modi laudantium nemo debitis.

Occaecati delectus ipsa fugiat maiores a odio. Similique voluptatem qui culpa. Facere quibusdam itaque recusandae excepturi et. Inventore quas ipsa enim voluptas omnis illum aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”