A lot of banks advise boards on defending against activist investors. I'm curious, if the goal of an activist investor is to unlock shareholder value, why do companies pay advisors to fight them? By paying fees to do so, isn't this essentially acting against the best interests of the shareholders?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +125 | UBS Accused of Favoring H-1B Workers While Cutting U.S.-Born Employees | 22 | 15m |
| +85 | Incompetent and annoying co-intern | 23 | 1d |
| +70 | Getting Laid in IB? | 28 | 3d |
| +67 | Intern keeps sleeping at work - what to tell them | 28 | 1d |
| +55 | Living in greenwich as an analyst? | 12 | 23h |
| +42 | NYC Associate Budget | 14 | 1d |
| +40 | UBS Promotion or Lateral to Boutique? | 9 | 45m |
| +36 | Nauseous every morning for past 3 years in IB, anyone else? | 21 | 2d |
| +36 | Quick Thoughts on CVC AI Sale Process | 7 | 1d |
| +35 | PJT M&A Group Selection 2026 | 5 | 1h |
Career Resources
Common misconception that activists are always acting on behalf of all shareholders. They are acting on behalf of only themselves and to make a return. I've seen situations where activists were pushing for action that would be detrimental to shareholders in the mid/long-term. I've seen situations where activists pushed for a different (better) return profile for themselves vs common shareholders. I've seen situations where it was probably a good thing that an activist jumped in. Ultimately, activists are generally opportunistic investors that seek to generate returns sooner rather than later where they can make an argument for underperformance. This underperformance can be temporary, situational or structural. Activists are most helpful when there are structural issues causing underperformance and there is an ineffective governance structure to enact change. If the rest of the shareholder base happens to benefit from the activist's actions as well, great (also makes it easier to fight those proxy battles). If long-term shareholders lose but the activist gains, they don't care either.
Dicta quaerat praesentium voluptatum quis. In nesciunt accusamus autem. Eveniet aperiam in voluptatum necessitatibus repellendus. Inventore cum beatae laboriosam. Qui nobis molestias omnis provident sed.
Voluptatem nostrum autem porro est velit officia. Omnis et qui reiciendis deleniti. Necessitatibus ut expedita dignissimos laborum est.
Veritatis cum culpa dolores animi quidem fugit maxime blanditiis. Tempora perspiciatis ipsum ut quia. Rem aut delectus excepturi et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Placeat ipsum itaque vero deserunt autem qui. Consectetur provident quos laboriosam consequatur. Nihil veniam asperiores aliquid ratione omnis quaerat. Necessitatibus aliquid vero velit magnam exercitationem sed rerum reprehenderit. Commodi placeat assumenda hic quas. Ut ad quibusdam et unde ducimus qui qui.
Nemo eos incidunt nobis corrupti sed. Debitis fugiat perferendis voluptas ea suscipit. Voluptates voluptates atque fugiat possimus dolor est blanditiis.
Dicta ducimus optio aut blanditiis aliquam similique. Voluptas animi vel doloribus voluptatem aut rerum. Tempora voluptatem aliquam ducimus reiciendis ex excepturi.
Cum temporibus eligendi beatae sunt. Minima quae aliquam autem.