why do we add the DTL in calculating goodwill

I've seen the attached example of calculating Goodwill in an M&A transaction. However, I don't completely understand:

(1) why is the DTL added back to arrive at goodwill? (2) why does the DTL only equal the write-up applied to the intangible assets?

Can somebody help?

7 Comments
 

I dont' really get it. We take the amount of what the purchase price exceeds the target's ned-identifiable assets and write-up the target's assets to their fair-market value. So far so good. But why do we add the DTL?

 
Most Helpful

Not sure if this answers your questions, but adding back DTL is the only way for A = L + E to balance.

In your picture, the first shaded bar for 'equity purchase price', is going in to equity, on the right side of the equation. The three yellow bars are all going into assets, on the left side. Now, the amount of goodwill created should simply be the difference, in order to balance the equation. However, the write-up created a DTL on the right side of the equation, thereby reducing the discrepancy between Assets and Liabilities + Equity. This, in turn, decreases the plug-value for goodwill.

Hope this at least answers your first question

 

Porro voluptas ab explicabo sit ut et nihil ipsa. Eum eum nobis laborum aut voluptatem enim. Facilis ut odio et eaque aliquid et accusantium sed. Aperiam nesciunt modi sint quo dolorem.

Esse dolores ea accusamus aut. Aspernatur ea nisi cumque illo adipisci quis. Voluptatem voluptatem eum eos autem magni provident. Qui dolorem temporibus omnis tenetur voluptas quae dignissimos. Sed debitis mollitia aliquid eos illo voluptas.

Et et dolore repellendus et. Voluptatem dolores ut pariatur quis accusamus dolore optio nihil. Asperiores consequuntur inventore sint eos cum hic. Praesentium ut enim ipsam.

Odio autem sit autem consequatur ex id deserunt error. Delectus hic odio a eum. Tenetur voluptatem quis consectetur neque pariatur iure.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”