Why does IB recruit from top schools?
Especially since IB doesn't require especially mentally tough work? The only explanation that I can think of is that top students have a good track record of hard work.
Especially since IB doesn't require especially mentally tough work? The only explanation that I can think of is that top students have a good track record of hard work.
| +232 | UBS preparing for a October Layoff Massacre | 188 | 1d |
| +174 | A Message to Students Who Think this Job Will Fix Their Life | 25 | 6h |
| +137 | Work and Suicide | 47 | 4h |
| +60 | Is 7 years in banking enough to retire, or am I delusional? | 31 | 1d |
| +51 | Interns without return offers, careers & perspective | 2 | 1h |
| +48 | Do actual investment bankers despise IB TikTokers as much as I think they do? | 28 | 3d |
| +41 | UBS IB Balance Sheet Set to take a Hit | 10 | 16h |
| +41 | Are all these UBS postings bullshit? | 7 | 3h |
| +27 | I'm in love with my MD | 7 | 1h |
| +26 | If Investment Banks Were Divorced Dads | 8 | 17h |
Career Resources
It's an easy filter. Why bother with kids going to a shitty school who likely don't have a track record of putting in enough effort, or aren't smart enough, when you can have your pick of students from Harvard?
Probably because they think that Ivey leagues only accepted the best candidates. Also knowing how hard it is to get into those schools may think they’re getting hard workers.
allows them to focus more on personality and fit since everyone has the academic horse power
Taking a cynical approach (not judging the merits of the situation) ... if you have 10,000 applications for 100 spots then picking from top schools is an easy way to filter CVs , gurantee baseline competence, and rightly or wrongly mitigate risk (HR faces less sh** if a Harvard grad is a dud vs ASU grad).
No one argues that the job requires a great deal of intellect, but if there are 1k apps for every seat, then its hard to argue that HR should value all universities equally. And after a while, the same ~20/~5 schools (US/UK) will be most represented and alumni will refer/help current students.
I mean also if you look at true non targets there is maybe 1 or 2 qualified candidates a year for banking. When I say qualified I mean like actually have put in the work to learn about the markets and network. I have seen these people make it, but they truly are the one person who could of gone to a top school, but just didn't have the resources(money) to go to a top school.
JP Morgan is trying to move away from this.
Quo in quas dolore voluptatum et est maxime. Aut et aspernatur eveniet modi deserunt et. Qui ut impedit nesciunt aut illo dolorem nihil. Voluptatem sint cum non. Magnam occaecati non omnis et sunt veniam sed. Illo est placeat rerum veritatis maiores aut similique.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...