18 Comments
 
  • genuine interest in energy
  • growing area, a lot more stuff is considered infra
  • some overlap with ESG for renewables / clean tech projects
  • some sense of feeling like your deals create public good / benefit
  • growth / VC - type feel for deals with developers
  • ability to work with developers over a very long period of time, starting from the initial idea stage to the IPO
  • see various types of deals along the capital structure (can do senior secured debt to common equity and everything in between (mezz, pref, etc.). Because of this, when one part of the market dies, you can pivot to another so deal flow is more consistent
  • travel at the junior level more than your peers
 
Most Helpful

This is literally what I do on a day to day… we’re not investing, but we’re the ones selling it to the infra PE investors. Right now most of my deals are with projects still in the development stage with two of them being just ideas right now. So yeah we work with developers a lot. Usually start with development equity and hopefully they’re successful enough / our seniors keep a strong relationship and they pick us to finance/underwrite future transactions for them as they mature.

It is different than most of PF at banks like SMBC/BMO/HSBC/CIBC which do a lot more pure lending / syndication type stuff in the PF space. Our PF group is much more like an IBD coverage group in terms of skillset and function, and has more of a skew towards equity private placements comparatively

 

joining an infra advisory m&a, mind sharing your experience within the space? So far how has it been, WLB, exits etc..

 

Curious about what you’ve said given the long lead times across PF deals from experience.

How does your group pick out which developers to approach and how can you guys generate revenue if you’re just working on an idea rather than the execution of transactions?

Retainer or lump sum fees?

 

Vs. traditional investment banking, I would say the main differences are the following:

  • you get to actually finance something tangible and see it get built. There is a sense that you are building things that are important for society (roads, airports, power plants, etc). This is extra true for folks working in renewables.
  • Work life balance is typically better than IB
 

I think it comes down to a couple reasons:

  1. Generally, it seems like the culture in project finance is not as cut-throat. The senior folks are more laid back and care about junior team's well-being. At least where I work, we are going to avoid assigning weekend work if at all possible whereas in traditional IB, I don't think people thing twice about juniors time.
  2. Deal closing timelines tend to be relatively long (2-3 months) and are partially driven by the borrower being able to deliver certain diligence reports. Delays are common due to project development issues. Additionally, there is a significant amount of legal work that goes on in the background that the finance team isn't responsible for.
  3. Agree with the comment about less pitches, but there are still lots of potential deals to analyze that we don't win, which take a decent amount of time, but probably not the same amount of time as building an LBO model and 50 page pitch deck would.
 

Voluptatibus aut reprehenderit eos tempora error doloremque autem dolores. Quia veritatis eveniet aut. Illo dolor quia molestiae. Facere distinctio neque suscipit voluptas dolorem. Dolore recusandae temporibus molestiae at.

At et voluptatem possimus occaecati voluptatem omnis. Qui sit numquam ut similique quaerat eaque. In vel et temporibus. Sapiente nihil explicabo quia odio minus expedita. Accusantium qui eligendi sint similique ipsa repudiandae et.

Deleniti omnis eum in commodi. Rerum reiciendis consequuntur voluptas. Cum porro rerum molestiae eos porro est molestiae. Officia recusandae ea fugit velit quia ex et. Cupiditate dolor et exercitationem. Labore iure atque voluptates ut repellendus molestiae in voluptates.

Aut laborum quis voluptatum. Aut ut quibusdam labore sapiente. Animi doloremque veritatis asperiores odit dignissimos. Repellendus cumque quasi perferendis quo quibusdam nisi autem magnam. Et est odio qui aut eveniet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”