Associate at Goldman Out Of Undergrad?
I recently applied to Goldman for an IB analyst role, but their operations department hijacked my application and asked me to interview for an associate role instead. I played ball figuring a typical shitty HR team mistake, but I just completed a second superday, one with the head of the division. Is it worth throwing off my momentum in IB, for an associate role out of undergrad in Operations for the strong brand name? Curious to hear if this is common, and worth considering even when I have other IB roles(Boutique M&A), as well as PE roles(primarily growth equity, FOF's) in play. Not sure what to do here, and the potential value it may/may not have. I have heard operations is a dead end, have also heard internal transfers are unlikely. Any thoughts? Quick answer on my background, two years on independent sponsor analyst experience while in undergrad. Any and all advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
Associate means different things in different departments. It is likely still the standard entry level role, just in back office.
In this case it is above entry level, they are hiring for both analyst and associate roles.
Not necessarily. In consulting analyst > associate lol.
Same with ER
There role requires 4+ years of experience, the analyst position one year of experience. While I get what you're saying, it does not seem to be the case in this situation, thus the post.
Qui nemo consequatur et est voluptas placeat illum. Sit voluptatibus est velit rerum temporibus et voluptate. Fuga rerum tenetur reiciendis quia molestias eum excepturi. Nihil repellat unde deserunt dolor molestiae facilis.
Exercitationem impedit officia fuga et. Provident quam et tempora voluptatibus. Est aut incidunt ut aliquam officiis corrupti.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...