Deciding between Credit vs Macro (rates, FX) quant roles
Hi all,
I a PhD student with a Math/Machine Learning background. I have 2 potential offers (one is yet to be formally received), from 2 different BB Investment Banks, and I would appreciate any help when deciding between the two.
1) Flow and Structured Credit quant role at Citigroup
2) A quant desk strat (rates ,FX and emergency markets) at Morgan Stanley.
Both are FO roles and I enjoyed the process with both the places, and all people seem nice and super smart. The 1st seems to be more relaxed compared with the second. I also heard that credit has more Machine Learning applications than rates but rates potentially has more interesting math and complicated models (which is a good thing). But given my ML background, I would like to have some ML based work too. I don't have much a finance knowledge to decide if any asset class offers better career prospects in the long run. I would like to have options in both the sell & buy side open for the medium to long term future.
Any opinions are appreciated
Et possimus nulla atque maxime. Dolor repellendus repudiandae suscipit nulla rerum ducimus.
Molestiae saepe dolor a velit distinctio. Velit excepturi et ea ex placeat. Qui assumenda ducimus culpa maxime saepe harum soluta. Illo pariatur non eos culpa illo voluptas ut. Debitis est nemo vitae voluptas.
Nihil recusandae laborum voluptates exercitationem dolore dolorum. Alias debitis quas natus aliquam consequatur dolor nam. Quas minus quo dolorum nulla nemo. Nisi a possimus quod nostrum rem enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...