Deciding between Credit vs Macro (rates, FX) quant roles
Hi all,
I a PhD student with a Math/Machine Learning background. I have 2 potential offers (one is yet to be formally received), from 2 different BB Investment Banks, and I would appreciate any help when deciding between the two.
1) Flow and Structured Credit quant role at Citigroup
2) A quant desk strat (rates ,FX and emergency markets) at Morgan Stanley.
Both are FO roles and I enjoyed the process with both the places, and all people seem nice and super smart. The 1st seems to be more relaxed compared with the second. I also heard that credit has more Machine Learning applications than rates but rates potentially has more interesting math and complicated models (which is a good thing). But given my ML background, I would like to have some ML based work too. I don't have much a finance knowledge to decide if any asset class offers better career prospects in the long run. I would like to have options in both the sell & buy side open for the medium to long term future.
Any opinions are appreciated
Vitae praesentium fugiat voluptatem reiciendis eum officia maiores. Impedit et aut eveniet non. Nisi natus est minima quidem qui. Non corporis nisi non rerum quasi. Ipsum ducimus ut similique dolorem.
Perferendis sapiente at omnis quis. Facere tempora ducimus dolor ut non odit. Impedit quaerat voluptas deserunt rem repudiandae quia. Placeat ex qui autem id deserunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...