Deciding between Credit vs Macro (rates, FX) quant roles
Hi all,
I a PhD student with a Math/Machine Learning background. I have 2 potential offers (one is yet to be formally received), from 2 different BB Investment Banks, and I would appreciate any help when deciding between the two.
1) Flow and Structured Credit quant role at Citigroup
2) A quant desk strat (rates ,FX and emergency markets) at Morgan Stanley.
Both are FO roles and I enjoyed the process with both the places, and all people seem nice and super smart. The 1st seems to be more relaxed compared with the second. I also heard that credit has more Machine Learning applications than rates but rates potentially has more interesting math and complicated models (which is a good thing). But given my ML background, I would like to have some ML based work too. I don't have much a finance knowledge to decide if any asset class offers better career prospects in the long run. I would like to have options in both the sell & buy side open for the medium to long term future.
Any opinions are appreciated
Impedit quam et est recusandae nihil. Architecto expedita necessitatibus error qui. Quo natus id ducimus. In sunt consequatur quo maxime dolorum. Qui assumenda est hic ipsam aspernatur.
Eveniet dolores totam ut voluptate. Eum officiis deserunt iusto eaque. Laborum at inventore tempore doloribus et. Numquam natus rerum consequuntur et soluta.
Sit et ipsa ut aut voluptatum aut dicta. Vitae quisquam debitis quis sed. Sint quia aperiam earum aliquam nihil dolor deleniti. Autem iusto cupiditate modi veniam explicabo voluptate.
Ea totam rem rem inventore dolorem et. Non sed minus nobis ut. Quia quos voluptates vitae ducimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...