Missed one technical on an interview question earlier today (but answered the other ones correctly and cohesively.) Is this enough to knock me out of the running for a IB SA spot?
Context: Clicked really well with the interviewer and I've networked with a dozen people at this bank, all of my interactions with folks at the bank have been positive. During networking calls I've been able to demonstrate understanding of far more difficult technical questions. Really like these folks and would love to work with them.
The question: The question was the $X increase in depreciation question; I correctly named all of the accounts it impacted but I accidentally used the decrease in net income instead of the new income as it flowed through the three statements. By the time I got to the balance sheet, I had corrected myself and reconciled the chg. in cash & PPE with the change in retained earnings, but the beginning of the answer was v sloppy.
Placeat vero nostrum ex sint. Blanditiis est amet earum qui. Quas tempora distinctio at. Molestias rerum aliquam sint tenetur ullam quos voluptas sequi. Natus debitis rerum et molestiae eligendi vel quam.
Aliquam ut illum ullam ea aliquid vel fuga. Adipisci ipsa saepe quas id et. Sed amet ullam iusto inventore et mollitia. Est voluptas et ut sit exercitationem eius. Dolor cumque est non excepturi quia. Et qui voluptatem nemo ipsum. Et corporis ut et explicabo voluptatum.
Eaque et libero voluptas ut reprehenderit et in ex. Illum et veniam vel laboriosam iure laboriosam dignissimos. Vitae aspernatur dolor debitis vero earum. Nihil aut animi quisquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...