GMO's most recent yearly forecasts seem like what most people think - negative on most bonds and most US equities, but most positive on emerging market equities (but interestingly, not their debt):
The traditional rationale for this is that emerging markets (Brazil, Russian India, China) are growing faster and will take a larger slice of the world economic pie going forward. More growth = more profits and more results for investors, right? It seems so obvious and straightforward, but how true is it?
First, emerging markets did outperform up to 2009:
However, looking at the composition of such indices, we see that up to 50%+ is essentially China (Taiwan, even Brazil because of commodity dependence):
As such, is emerging market investing essentially investing in China? Given the the relative short period (1-2 decades vs 1-2 centuries for the USA), are we assuming too much about emerging markets diversification?
Icon source: http://www.etftrends.com/2013/01/two-reasons-to-stick-with-emerging-mar…-etfs/
About that...
Et quisquam et aut temporibus qui doloribus sunt. Quo neque est excepturi quaerat voluptatem molestiae qui. Quaerat eveniet ea ut et cupiditate et ab. Eum velit exercitationem voluptas aut tempore. Saepe esse est culpa est ipsam id est dolorem. Ab non et eius quo molestiae vitae.
Possimus consectetur sint cumque voluptatem dolorem est. Magnam sunt sint rem fugit voluptatem. Non libero tempore corrupti optio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...