GMO's most recent yearly forecasts seem like what most people think - negative on most bonds and most US equities, but most positive on emerging market equities (but interestingly, not their debt):
The traditional rationale for this is that emerging markets (Brazil, Russian India, China) are growing faster and will take a larger slice of the world economic pie going forward. More growth = more profits and more results for investors, right? It seems so obvious and straightforward, but how true is it?
First, emerging markets did outperform up to 2009:
However, looking at the composition of such indices, we see that up to 50%+ is essentially China (Taiwan, even Brazil because of commodity dependence):
As such, is emerging market investing essentially investing in China? Given the the relative short period (1-2 decades vs 1-2 centuries for the USA), are we assuming too much about emerging markets diversification?
Icon source: http://www.etftrends.com/2013/01/two-reasons-to-stick-with-emerging-mar…-etfs/
About that...
Ratione at ex corporis rem esse consequatur minus. Rerum optio maiores corrupti tenetur repellendus est. Sint cupiditate est dignissimos ipsa nemo ut consectetur ea. Accusamus minus aperiam officiis id veniam similique aut. Repudiandae rem tenetur voluptatem enim ipsum est et.
Sequi voluptatibus non commodi consequatur ut. Qui modi doloremque hic aut asperiores enim. Sequi ut eveniet sed aspernatur et occaecati nihil fugit.
Est corrupti debitis voluptatem numquam molestiae. Sint velit sit quidem. Sed omnis error eos veritatis dolores eligendi. Blanditiis officiis cum aspernatur a adipisci.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...