First it was the censorship, then the ads, and now no links. I understand the rationale to want to keep people on the site, but for one, in a debate you have to list your source. And that’s usually a link. It may draw people away from the cite for a second, but if WSO is good enough people will always come back.
Bring back links! Bring back links! Bring back links!
| +49 | SpaceX IPO - what are your thoughts | 10 | 5h |
| +28 | Should I use Claude or chatgpt? | 15 | 14h |
| +21 | Funny Things to Say to Interns | 7 | 17h |
| +17 | How did you meet your significant other/partner? | 13 | 1d |
| +17 | London's future as a financial centre | 18 | 2d |
| The Great Debate | 9 | 19h | |
| +7 | E ink/electronic notepads | 4 | 1d |
| +6 | Stay Sharp All Day With Best Modvigil 200 MG Tablet | 0 | 1d |
| +6 | Test post will be deleted automatically. | 11 | 1d |
| +5 | get a model before you model | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
It seems like you're voicing frustration over the removal of links on WSO, which is a valid concern for fostering transparent and credible discussions. Based on the most recent WSO threads, moderation changes have been a hot topic, with users expressing dissatisfaction over increased restrictions, including content removal and transparency issues. For example, in the thread titled "New WSO Moderation Efforts [Updates Here]", there’s mention of moderation updates like comment visibility changes and stricter content review processes (https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/new-wso-modera…</a">source).
Your point about links being essential for debates and sourcing is strong. If WSO aims to maintain its reputation as a hub for finance professionals, allowing users to cite credible sources could enhance the quality of discussions. While the rationale for limiting links might be to retain users on the platform, as you said, a high-quality forum will naturally keep its audience engaged.
If you want to push for this change, consider starting a thread or petition on WSO to gather community support. Highlight how links can improve the forum's credibility and user experience.
Sources: New WSO Moderation Efforts [Updates Here], Rescinded from Harvard... Now What????, New WSO Moderation Efforts [Updates Here], https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/hello-old-friends?customgpt=1, Mind the pay gap
https://what.the.heck.com
Links still don’t work for me - what is this fake link?
Agreed. I tried linking to a financial model for a kid going through an interview process and I got flagged and couldn't post. Ridiculous. Add a captcha or require a phone number if you don't want bots.
What links are you trying to post?
I'd guess WSO is selectively blocking sites, potentially perceived competitors.
I can't post any links. It just shows up as blank like the post above.
There was a bug in the input sanitization that incorrectly cut off the YouTube links like the one you posted above. Do you have issues with other links?
not intentional...fix on the way
Consectetur fuga dolores rem recusandae. Nisi est libero totam repudiandae voluptas ut laboriosam veniam. Vel facere sint neque similique et voluptas repellat. Doloremque vitae qui quidem sit qui. Neque dolore tempora omnis dolorem modi aliquam hic. Reiciendis sed adipisci quos est vero.
Vitae nihil dignissimos perferendis repellat. Eum qui sed eos pariatur voluptate neque. Tempora nostrum sed iusto.
Sunt beatae et et ipsa. Rem incidunt culpa nesciunt ipsum libero et. Quis odio explicabo quo quia quisquam. Totam voluptas eum accusantium labore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...