Cheating for Charity

Would you cheat for charity? No, I am not talking about having an extramarital affair with your favorite beautiful blonde stripper named Charity. A study at the University of Bath has sought to answer this question, using psychology and economics undergrads as the test subjects.

Part of the study involved the students rolling a die under a cup for only them to see the result. The numbers would relate to the amount of money the researchers would donate to cancer research. Here's what they found:

"The key finding here is that the students tended to report higher numbers than you'd expect from a fair die. So, for example, 24.5 per cent of participants said they'd rolled a six whereas a fair die should have produced a figure of 17 per cent. The researchers estimated that this means 9 per cent of participants lied about rolling a six. This is substantially higher than the figure obtained in a previous study when participants were playing for their own cash reward and it therefore shows how people indulge in moral relativism. More people seem to think it's okay to cheat if it's for charity, than if it's for their own gain."

From BPS Research Digest

It also turns out that the economics undergrads were more likely to lie than the psychology undergrads. Being an economics major myself, I found this pretty interesting. The researchers are suggesting this study presents a cause for concern in financial institutions.

"At the level of individual differences it has been demonstrated that economists are more willing to cheat," the researchers said. "This is of some concern given that people with economics degrees hold prominent positions in financial institutions."

But weren't they only more likely to cheat for charity? I don't know many financial institutions that run like charities, therefore wouldn't this be more of a concern for non-profits and charitable organizations?

Regardless, it's a pretty interesting psychological study. I personally would have thought that individual greed would trump altruistic charity as a motivator for cheating. WSO, what do you think? Would you be more likely to cheat if it was for a good cause rather than to simply pad your pockets?

7 Comments
 

intuitively seems to make sense, since even if people would be caught to be cheating they could always argue it was for charity.

sample size of die rolls would be useful, if they did this of like 100 rolls then statistics is pretty weak.

 
leveredarb

sample size of die rolls would be useful, if they did this of like 100 rolls then statistics is pretty weak.

And also, what was the percentage for the study when they were rolling for their own monetary reward?

Sometimes lies are more dependable than the truth.
 

I'd cheat for anything.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.
 
Best Response

Not to be an ass or anything, but this sounds pretty ridiculous... All this might prove is that Univerity of Bath's economy undergrads are more likely to cheat for charity than psych majors. Extrapolating this to the whole financial world is nonsense, I don't care how big their sample size is. If they did this over smth like the top 200 unis in US/Europe for finance recruiting maybe it would make some sense. You can also make the argument that since they cheated for charity, they would be more likely to disregard corporate profits in order to give employees better benefits, not fire someone with kids or contribute more to society in whatever way, so they would be OWS dream executives. Oh, and economists =/= financiers.

 

I don't care enough about charity to compromise my morals for it. But for a Ferrari FF I would.

He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.
 

Provident ex omnis modi quia. Repellat beatae et id corrupti cum aperiam ut optio. Et neque eius quaerat hic et. Et occaecati sapiente blanditiis odit magnam deserunt. Quos iste a repudiandae. Sed laborum laboriosam amet eligendi.

In assumenda ea architecto cumque. Ducimus nihil mollitia enim quia est. Veritatis odit quia consequuntur sit dolorem doloribus rerum ipsa.

Est laboriosam rem ut iste corrupti doloribus. Quaerat aspernatur similique hic. Saepe soluta unde et autem explicabo repellat sequi itaque.

Expedita dignissimos quidem ut. Assumenda est porro magnam autem qui. Inventore porro est voluptate eaque nisi id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”