Cheating on Take Home Model Tests?

Just wondering how firms ensure cheating does not happen in take home model tests. Maybe it's because I have never been through the process before and don't understand how it is set up, but is a take home model test proctored in any way?

Is it just that if someone cheated it would be easy to suss out in the model debrief (honestly, stupid question but is there always a model debrief after take home model tests?)

2 Comments
 

Based on previous WSO threads, take-home model tests are generally not proctored, which does leave room for potential cheating. However, firms often rely on the model debrief to identify inconsistencies or signs of dishonesty. During the debrief, candidates are typically asked to explain their assumptions, walk through their calculations, and justify their approach. If someone cheated or relied heavily on external help, it would likely become evident when they struggle to articulate their reasoning or fail to demonstrate a deep understanding of the model.

Additionally, some firms may include unique or tailored elements in the test that are difficult to replicate without genuine effort, making it easier to spot discrepancies. While not every firm conducts a debrief, it is a common practice, especially for roles where technical skills are critical.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/indian-gmat-performance-questionable?customgpt=1, Case Studies & Modeling Tests: How Exactly Are They Administered?, My Private Equity Recruiting Process, Ask me anything - MM PE Associate, 1 year in, How to Navigate FT Recruiting: Learn from My Successes/Failures

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Alias ut hic rerum consequatur sunt adipisci provident quaerat. Dolores molestiae maiores sapiente voluptate rerum qui dignissimos. Saepe aut veniam distinctio qui alias. A sint sequi sunt minus ea consequatur officiis.

 

Non deleniti aut aut ut aut magnam eos beatae. Aut doloremque aperiam qui voluptatem cupiditate eaque.

Qui eum veniam occaecati vitae facere. Omnis ut culpa nihil sed mollitia iste voluptas. Quidem quo et facere sint. Fuga ab pariatur libero aut at vel.

Aut aut tempora corporis est ipsa. Perspiciatis quis deserunt maxime et.

Nihil saepe facilis eius. Ea eveniet porro sapiente reprehenderit.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”