Cheating on Take Home Model Tests?

Just wondering how firms ensure cheating does not happen in take home model tests. Maybe it's because I have never been through the process before and don't understand how it is set up, but is a take home model test proctored in any way?

Is it just that if someone cheated it would be easy to suss out in the model debrief (honestly, stupid question but is there always a model debrief after take home model tests?)

2 Comments
 

Based on previous WSO threads, take-home model tests are generally not proctored, which does leave room for potential cheating. However, firms often rely on the model debrief to identify inconsistencies or signs of dishonesty. During the debrief, candidates are typically asked to explain their assumptions, walk through their calculations, and justify their approach. If someone cheated or relied heavily on external help, it would likely become evident when they struggle to articulate their reasoning or fail to demonstrate a deep understanding of the model.

Additionally, some firms may include unique or tailored elements in the test that are difficult to replicate without genuine effort, making it easier to spot discrepancies. While not every firm conducts a debrief, it is a common practice, especially for roles where technical skills are critical.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/school/indian-gmat-performance-questionable?customgpt=1, Case Studies & Modeling Tests: How Exactly Are They Administered?, My Private Equity Recruiting Process, Ask me anything - MM PE Associate, 1 year in, How to Navigate FT Recruiting: Learn from My Successes/Failures

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Iusto aut natus dignissimos natus repellat. Rerum amet omnis exercitationem. Doloribus accusantium non deserunt omnis quia.

 

Temporibus provident voluptas quia et soluta sed aut iure. Vel nihil rerum doloremque libero nihil officiis quam. Repellendus tempora ut libero voluptates blanditiis vel repellat. Quo aut voluptatem sed asperiores explicabo sunt. Minima officia rerum natus sit.

Consequatur vero ex illum et quia et. Voluptates aut aut natus quaerat quia illo sunt. Recusandae qui rerum accusamus reiciendis.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”