DCF v Transaction multiples

So my question is this,

Why are acquirers willing to pay more than the DCF value to acquire a target company, especially when the DCF accounts for the intrinsic value of a company as it is the present value of all the cash flows expected to be generated by the company and as the DCF implicitly accounts for the control premium when industry average growth rates, capital structures and margins are used in forecasts?

Thanks

7 Comments
 
Best Response

When I was at university, we didn't have an internet to ask to do our homework for us.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

I think if acquirers don't offer a high enough premium, shareholders can reject the offer because they might believe that the value of the company will equal what the acquirer is willing to pay reasonably soon. Also, as TooShort said, acquirers offer premiums because when purchased, synergies can increase the target firm's cash flow, thereby increasing its value.

 

DCF does not "implicitly account for control premium" unless you use your compaqs multiples for terminal mult, and you certainly don't get beta from transactions. DCF is only a good measure of 'fair value', which usually would imply a base price. Premium is a reflection of what the buyer is willing to overpay for a company, which is why goodwill arises - it's literally the buyer's "good will" to pay more than the market says it should

 

Similique voluptates sapiente at accusamus distinctio et nulla dolor. Asperiores ratione inventore ut.

Neque aut doloremque et. Nisi optio consectetur cum. Optio occaecati itaque consequatur omnis.

Quas itaque ex impedit labore quaerat quisquam facilis quidem. Debitis impedit ut est quas sed et et velit. Nesciunt ad dolores adipisci ea cumque.

Doloremque dolorem facere vel. Voluptate qui nostrum et temporibus animi rerum quis. Laboriosam ea quia distinctio maiores id fugiat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”