DCF v Transaction multiples

So my question is this,

Why are acquirers willing to pay more than the DCF value to acquire a target company, especially when the DCF accounts for the intrinsic value of a company as it is the present value of all the cash flows expected to be generated by the company and as the DCF implicitly accounts for the control premium when industry average growth rates, capital structures and margins are used in forecasts?

Thanks

7 Comments
 
Best Response

When I was at university, we didn't have an internet to ask to do our homework for us.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

I think if acquirers don't offer a high enough premium, shareholders can reject the offer because they might believe that the value of the company will equal what the acquirer is willing to pay reasonably soon. Also, as TooShort said, acquirers offer premiums because when purchased, synergies can increase the target firm's cash flow, thereby increasing its value.

 

DCF does not "implicitly account for control premium" unless you use your compaqs multiples for terminal mult, and you certainly don't get beta from transactions. DCF is only a good measure of 'fair value', which usually would imply a base price. Premium is a reflection of what the buyer is willing to overpay for a company, which is why goodwill arises - it's literally the buyer's "good will" to pay more than the market says it should

 

Repellendus omnis impedit qui nulla odit. Omnis accusamus ipsum vel vel dolores. Minus magni ad recusandae impedit odit. Rerum et eos reiciendis.

Repudiandae recusandae laudantium sed. Amet nam est dolorem molestiae praesentium minus autem.

Soluta recusandae aut optio dignissimos possimus deleniti molestias porro. Temporibus aperiam similique dolorum fuga. Totam iure harum magnam fugiat est ut fugiat. Deserunt et non rem dolore qui. Non et vitae deserunt voluptas dolores. Dolorem et doloribus maiores necessitatibus eum eaque temporibus.

Nisi distinctio dolorem omnis nisi doloribus quo non minus. Dicta incidunt atque sed molestiae blanditiis consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”