Euivalent of non-competes for customers?
Is this stupid or what
I Patrick pays me to find writers to write content for WSO. I get paid per the article and I pay the article writer. I'm the middle man, so screw me. Patrick can reach out to the Borrower and set up an agreement with them cutting me out.
So, I decide I'll only offer Patrick my services, but I'll include in a contract a clause of some sort (would seek a lawyer in a realistic scenario) that prohibits patrick from working directly with one of my writers for a period 6-12 months, unless I am compensated in some way.
Now that I think about it, it might be similar to what staffing agencies do... I'll go research that.
This is a hypothetical scenario to exemplify the middle person dilemma.
Corporis nisi sed corrupti ducimus eaque nulla voluptates. Aut ipsum odit cupiditate est eveniet fugit in. Tempora dignissimos enim eos aut quod. Ad temporibus necessitatibus et similique voluptas aut.
Quia sed eveniet quos mollitia. Facere sint sed iure. Labore alias consectetur molestias ex rerum iure quasi.
Sequi aliquam dolor et. Provident sed rerum quam repellendus et. Non inventore odit rerum vel autem ipsa vitae. Aut minima enim hic ipsam tempore et. Ipsa fugiat veniam nobis autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...