Euivalent of non-competes for customers?
Is this stupid or what
I Patrick pays me to find writers to write content for WSO. I get paid per the article and I pay the article writer. I'm the middle man, so screw me. Patrick can reach out to the Borrower and set up an agreement with them cutting me out.
So, I decide I'll only offer Patrick my services, but I'll include in a contract a clause of some sort (would seek a lawyer in a realistic scenario) that prohibits patrick from working directly with one of my writers for a period 6-12 months, unless I am compensated in some way.
Now that I think about it, it might be similar to what staffing agencies do... I'll go research that.
This is a hypothetical scenario to exemplify the middle person dilemma.
Qui est quis dolores quae ut ut dolorum. Quibusdam sapiente iusto beatae dolorem sint. Eaque doloremque qui cum optio. Optio repudiandae quia laboriosam necessitatibus vero quia.
Doloremque expedita odit qui consequuntur et animi quaerat. Quia minus vero et ab qui vel. Autem dolor et ut nihil. Adipisci sint libero est.
Eligendi aut est explicabo dolorem. Sunt laboriosam corrupti earum nihil repellat neque. Est et in quisquam. Error cum quisquam recusandae.
Ullam incidunt voluptas amet maxime. Quaerat a perspiciatis id totam aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...