Global Currency

I'm putting it to you.

One of my professors is writing a paper about this and has asked me to assist him.

But I was wondering what you guys think?

Do you think a global currency would work?

Would it have prevented the financial crisis in 2008?

Will it prevent issues in the future?

Thoughts?

17 Comments
 

Seems like a bad idea for the same reason that the Euro (as it is now) is a bad idea. Way too many different countries with different needs and wants in terms of monetary policy. Individual countries can't control the overall money supply which will cause some to overheat and cause some to lag behind more than if they had full control.

If you are asking whether its a good opportunity though, definitely do it, it seems like a really cool thing to do.

 
alexpaschIt's a stupid idea. And if Krugman is espousing it, then that's all the proof you need that it's a stupid idea, no further research necessary.

Krugman never espoused it. If you know so little about the body of work on the subject that you would argue he did, then you really should not comment on it. OCA and NEG is all about how a global currency would not work. Whether or not you respect his writing as a blogger and columnist, the fact remains that Krugman is one of the greatest economists of the current generation, and that you would be extremely hard-pressed to find a good economist who does not respect his work in international trade.

A global currency has been tried; that is essentially what gold standard I, II and III were. Refer to the monetary trilemma for reasons this can not work.

 
alexpaschIt's a stupid idea. And if Krugman is espousing it, then that's all the proof you need that it's a stupid idea, no further research necessary.
this post shows you have no idea about wtf is going on.

global currency is an aweful idea.

/thread

 
txjustinSo is he writing a paper in favor?

If so, I'd tell that liberal professor to fuck off.

Haha. No, he isnt. He's open to suggestions, but seeing as he has two groups of 4 students total researching the topic, its bound to be a 'yes, no' conclusion' type.

 
FinancialNoviceII
txjustinSo is he writing a paper in favor?

If so, I'd tell that liberal professor to fuck off.

Haha. No, he isnt. He's open to suggestions, but seeing as he has two groups of 4 students total researching the topic, its bound to be a 'yes, no' conclusion' type.

In that case it sounds like a good opportunity to be quite honest. Go for it.

 

I mean, I just can't imagine how bored a professor would have to be to look at this. There is a monumental body of work on the subject; it has been, as I said, tried three times; there is a clear example in Europe right now how it doesn't work on even a small scale sans OCA. I simply don't see what more there is to be said on the subject. It's possible I'm missing something, but I doubt it.

Also, I don't really see it as a liberal v conservative issue; any economist on either side of the ideological spectrum will tell you it is a dumb idea. Their reasons may differ, but their conclusions will be the same. The people who I do see it appealing to would be those who think the gold standard was brilliant, and those people are generally conservative (or libertarian, if you prefer).

 
drexelalum11I mean, I just can't imagine how bored a professor would have to be to look at this. There is a monumental body of work on the subject; it has been, as I said, tried three times; there is a clear example in Europe right now how it doesn't work on even a small scale sans OCA. I simply don't see what more there is to be said on the subject. It's possible I'm missing something, but I doubt it.

Also, I don't really see it as a liberal v conservative issue; any economist on either side of the ideological spectrum will tell you it is a dumb idea. Their reasons may differ, but their conclusions will be the same. The people who I do see it appealing to would be those who think the gold standard was brilliant, and those people are generally conservative (or libertarian, if you prefer).

Being a Libertarian, we think more isolationist. So yes, some of us want a Gold Standard, for America.

 
Best Response
txjustin
drexelalum11I mean, I just can't imagine how bored a professor would have to be to look at this. There is a monumental body of work on the subject; it has been, as I said, tried three times; there is a clear example in Europe right now how it doesn't work on even a small scale sans OCA. I simply don't see what more there is to be said on the subject. It's possible I'm missing something, but I doubt it.

Also, I don't really see it as a liberal v conservative issue; any economist on either side of the ideological spectrum will tell you it is a dumb idea. Their reasons may differ, but their conclusions will be the same. The people who I do see it appealing to would be those who think the gold standard was brilliant, and those people are generally conservative (or libertarian, if you prefer).

Being a Libertarian, we think more isolationist. So yes, some of us want a Gold Standard, for America.

Isolationism and libertarianism are philosophically incompatible, as isolationism allows for political barriers to interfere with the contractual relationships between consenting parties.

Also, you realize the most likely outcome for a gold standard would be to hand congress the keys to monetary policy, yes?

"Dude, not trying to be a dick here, but your shop looks like a frontrunner for the cover of Better Boilerrooms & Chophouses or Bucketshop Quarterly." -Uncle Eddie
 
drexelalum11I mean, I just can't imagine how bored a professor would have to be to look at this. There is a monumental body of work on the subject; it has been, as I said, tried three times; there is a clear example in Europe right now how it doesn't work on even a small scale sans OCA. I simply don't see what more there is to be said on the subject. It's possible I'm missing something, but I doubt it.

Also, I don't really see it as a liberal v conservative issue; any economist on either side of the ideological spectrum will tell you it is a dumb idea. Their reasons may differ, but their conclusions will be the same. The people who I do see it appealing to would be those who think the gold standard was brilliant, and those people are generally conservative (or libertarian, if you prefer).

He mentioned it was in conjunction with UChicago, (Economics professor there) so sounded like too good an opportunity to pass up.

Drex, can you recommend any books that I ought to chase up or articles to read giving either perspective?

 

Velit nihil maxime vitae ipsam harum odit. At earum sed vitae quod qui. Quam impedit molestiae fuga sint maxime quos quisquam voluptas.

Aut nostrum ut debitis laboriosam culpa ut expedita. Impedit nihil et molestiae occaecati omnis voluptatem vitae accusantium. Veritatis ut voluptatem omnis magni amet earum qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”