I've come to a conclusion that entrepreneurship is just next to impossible

  1. Toys R Us = bankrupt
  2. Equifax incident showed us what liability risk exposed looks like
  3. Overcapacity of metals sector in China shows us what happens to high cost producers like smelters in America's rust belt
  4. bad financial management : Lehman Bros
  5. Inability to be a good steward of capital = Bernie Madoff
  6. Inability to deliver a proper product that works = Theranos
  7. Even if the product does work will they buy it (the customers ? ) = Juicero
  8. How do you know your distribution model won't screw you over ? Sears + WMT
 

Everything you also listed is at the extreme end of the negatives.  

You do know that the owner of your local dry cleaners is an entreprenuer right?  No one said it is easy, but to say it is next to impossible would be an insane statement.  A huge segment of the American working population are self employed. 

 

There are definitely plenty of businesses out there that are still very successful. Hell, I have a friend that makes a descent living fixing old vaporizers and selling them online at a discount. It is not impossible to be an entrepreneur, however, it is not easy. As an example starting an investment advisory and managing it honestly has not been ruined because of Bernie Madoff. Sears had a pretty solid run before it reached where it is at today and walmart is not quite near the verge of going extinct. The people who started these companies were well rewarded from their efforts (exception of Bernie Madoff as he was just skilled thief). If you have an idea and are willing to risk it you can still go for it and if you were right you could expect to be compensated handsomely.

Only two sources I trust, Glenn Beck and singing woodland creatures.
 

A few bad apples (hell, not all of those are done and gone) aren't very representative of entrepreneurship. Most of those examples are perhaps a failure of the business to adapt, but there is an entrepreneur on the other side who did adapt. Even then, as Ehmerica said, the original entrepreneurs in these companies likely cashed out and made a good living.

 

Coming from a VC background, I think that every industry has bad apples or simply businesses that didn't work out.

That doesn't mean nobody should ever try it. If nobody tried anything we wouldn't have the life we have atm.

A friend of mine quit his job in London, and moved with his wife to Mumbai (his wife is Indian). They took all their money and threw it at 12 tech companies/startups. I believe 6 or 7 failed immediately, 3 are surviving, and 2 had a 7x/12x return. Neither one of them had a background in finance or VC and barely knew enough about tech.

Sometimes you have to do unusual things to make it happen.

 

Entrepreneurism isn't primarily analytical. It's about passion. Do you need to be analytical? No. It helps but you don't need to be. As you grow it would be beneficial to have someone be strategic (likely founder) and someone tactical (growth operator). Usually different people as they require very different mindsets and personalities. Funny this forum speaks primarily to banking and money / wealth. As a business owner in the financial space, I know far more wealthy small business owners than bankers. Guess it depends how you define wealth, but even if you measure it with $s there are tons of business owners making well into seven figures and have businesses that can be sold.

As an example, good friend owns a company worth low 8 figures and pulls out 750k per yr with minimal work (these days, used to be much more I'm sure). Has for over 20 years. Could have sold it many times over that period but loves the cash flow. His company makes springs for recliners (think Lazyboy type stuff). That's it. That's all they do.

Another buddy owns /operates a chain of BBQ joints (6 locations) in NC / GA. Great cash flow from the business and nice wealth creation from the RE. He could sell the business for a few mil and hold on to the property to collect rent forever. RE is worth at least 8M.

In both cases, they LOVED what they did / do in terms of building a business. That's the key. Passion!

 

Yeah it's pretty surprising that more people on here don't try to start something on their own for a couple of years. They say it's because they're risk averse, but if you already have the pedigree of banking => pe or even just banking, taking a couple of years to build a biz isn't risky at all. Worst case, you enroll in b school if your attempt fails, or you just go back to banking. It's much more risky to keep your source of income in the control of someone else (your employer) for your entire life. From talking to biz owners over the past year (RE and ecomm), it's never been more clear to me that the best thing to do is take risks and grab as much equity as possible early on in life. 

In the above cases, were they passionate about it to begin with or did the passion build over time? I'd imagine anyone who's building their own company and starts seeing it's going to work for them will become passionate about it. For example, I know someone who started an ecomm biz with a random product that he didn't have much interest in but he knew there was a solid market for it. He became more and more passionate about it the more it scaled as he was working on different aspects of the biz and it was like a game to him, trying to get better every year.

 

Great post. I'm a business owner and I've always said (when people ask me about risk taking) that I think the riskiest position to be in is working for someone else, them controlling your pay AND time. Entrepreneurs just view things differently. I used to ask myself what would someone have to pay me  be their employee, knowing I wouldn't make more than X and my time wouldn't be mine (probably the biggest issue). I could never come up with an answer because being controlled by someone else isn't natural to me. Traditional workers think differently. More like, how can that guy over there risk not knowing when or if he'll get paid, where new clients come from, etc.

It's just a different mindset. Personally I have the mindset that no compensation happens ahead of value creation. However, once value is created, there's no limit on comp, opportunities, etc. I used to attend a business owner "study group" for lack of a better term. We'd meet quarterly for 2 days, brainstorm ideas (all different industries but all owners) see what was working and what wasn't, do some goal setting, check in on progress,  You'd be amazed at the synergies in the room. many of us became clients of each other (which would pay for the meetings at luxury locations) and I always left with at least one good 250k idea. Up to me to flesh out and implement. This is what entrepreneurs do. We don't really understand workers (although we have many working for us) and they don't understand us. I laugh when people say they're studying entrepreneurship in college. It doesn't work like that. There's no formula or method. 

 

I just remembered this is the dude who shat on working class people black and white alike. Lmfao and he has this loser mentality.

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

Successful Entrepreneurship is really the dream - you keep most of the profits, you make your own schedule - what could be better?

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Focusing on the losers! You'll die a very memorable life OP. 

 

Cumque ut fugiat cum modi omnis tempora. Voluptas voluptatum doloribus non quis nam et. Quis quis assumenda totam neque. Molestiae accusantium at sit earum explicabo earum.

Magni sit quo harum. Voluptate quas omnis et deserunt natus esse consectetur. Exercitationem et quibusdam fugiat necessitatibus numquam repellendus aut necessitatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”