New Labour In the USA

I recently finished a review of Tony Blair’s biography, “A Journey,” and while writing it I began wondering whether any of the policies traditionally associated with British politics would be effective here in the USA.

Take each political party for instance. Would a political party like Blair’s “New Labour” be successful here?

Before 1997, the Labour Party was dominated by trade unions and intelligentsia (traditional left-leaning strongholds), a demographic which Tony Blair felt was out of touch with modern society. He set about rebranding the party and its policies as “New Labour.”

The result was a “third way progressive politics” of sorts that could be considered socially liberal and relatively fiscally conservative. Its tenets included:

Public services as a “hand up,” not a “hand out”;

Cracking down hard on crime, antisocial behavior, and illegal immigration;

Tuition fees for universities;

On foreign policy, a combination of “hard” and “soft” power;

Closer integration with Europe;

Civil unions;

Competition among public schools in the form of academies;

Initial intervention for stability, but no further quantitative easing in the event of a financial crisis.

During his 10 years of efforts to promote this platform, his biggest frustration was that most people would agree with large parts of it, but very few bought the entire package.

My question, dear monkeys, is: Would the American public?

With the majority of Americans recently cited as “angry” or “very angry” with the current state of politics, would this third party system have a legitimate chance at tapping into voter anger? And not just tap into voter anger, but build the ground-up core of believers necessary for long-term success?

The logic in favor of it suggests that most Americans are moderates, and although New Labour doesn’t contain everything they wish for, it contains a lot that they agree with, and the blockheads in charge just cost us our AAA rating, so why don’t we give this new thing a shot? Is it already happening in one or both of the parties? Or would it just be Ross Perot all over again?

Would it work? Would you vote New Labour USA in 2012?

18 Comments
 

I think I would vote for them and I believe many other people would as well. If it could be sold to both sides, who wouldn't want to try something new?

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

SWB: Keep in mind that people fear change.

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 

No, "New Labour" would have no chance in the United States. The British conservatives are to the left of mainstream Democrats in the United States. The United States, at this point, would reject prima facia anything similar to social democracy.

Array
 
Virginia Tech 4everNo, "New Labour" would have no chance in the United States. The British conservatives are to the left of mainstream Democrats in the United States. The United States, at this point, would reject prima facia anything similar to social democracy.

At the same time though, don't you think people are disillusioned enough that they'd be willing to give something else a shot?

Metal. Music. Life. www.headofmetal.com
 
Virginia Tech 4everNo, "New Labour" would have no chance in the United States. The British conservatives are to the left of mainstream Democrats in the United States. The United States, at this point, would reject prima facia anything similar to social democracy.
"Prima facie," to be correct. The root word is 'facies'.
I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

NY: Obama didn't change anything, except for marginally increasing the size of government. The majority of what he has done has been to continue Bush's policies. And even with the small extent of change he did get through (healthcare and stimulus, though there was a stimulus under Bush as well so its not much of a change), the country exploded on him. No one thought there would be real change with him. The blacks still blame their poor place in the country on racism. We are still on the path to European style serfdom that we already were. People could have change, with Ron Paul or something, but I think Sowell summed it up well when he said that the country has inevitably been shifting to the left slowly under republicans, and less slowly under democrats.

“...all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” - Schopenhauer
 
Best Response

At this point I am receptive to any legitimate political party outside of team red or team blue so long as they aren't advocating direct socialism. As you were alluding to, the present climate provides the best conditions for a third party to launch into the mainstream: a general lack of leadership on either side, a sustained shitty economy, deteriorating infrastructure, disconnect between "the elite" and the middle and lower class, and the effects of 10 years of constant war wearing on the country.

I'm doubting that a significant portion of voters would rally around an entire political platform. Most of the successful political parties in history began around a single movement or issue (think republican party c. 1850s or UK liberal party c. 1840s) to then grew around an ideology or manifesto concurrent with their popularity and relevance.

Issues which I believe are capable of garnering this support:

1) Balancing the federal budget (perotists)

2) drug legalization (don't underestimate this as our generation gains influence)

3) tax reform (early tea party)

4) military disengagement (if it ever progresses beyond anti-bush rallies)

5) protectionism (unfortunately)

Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art - Andy Warhol
 

Period goes on the inside when using quotation marks, outside when the punctuation does not apply to the words denoted by the quotation but rather to the sentence as a whole.

I guess we are. ;-)

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
A Posse Ad EssePeriod goes on the inside when using quotation marks, outside when the punctuation does not apply to the words denoted by the quotation but rather to the sentence as a whole.

I guess we are. ;-)

Well, according to this you're wrong with regard to periods.

http://grammartips.homestead.com/inside.html

The point wasn't to correct your grammar but to point out how, umm, weird it is to correct someone's spelling on a message board full of grammatical and spelling errors that people generally don't edit out because it's, umm, a message board. I'll admit I was the asshat who used to correct people's grammar on message boards--but I was 14-years-old at the time.

Array
 

I would vote for the Pirate Party of Nigerian Princes if I thought it would matter even in the slightest

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Iste laboriosam aliquam consequatur exercitationem et rerum perspiciatis cum. Iure vero omnis repellat quia. Blanditiis at error saepe harum nam sint. Et non aliquid aspernatur suscipit aliquam. Velit enim ut voluptas sit ipsam.

Nisi cupiditate aut sapiente cumque ad. Magni amet quia voluptatibus ut rerum.

Adipisci natus officiis aut praesentium culpa. Voluptates laborum sunt voluptatum consequatur voluptatibus occaecati similique.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”