New Social Media Fund BS or Right Play for the Future?

This week, investment firm Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers (KPCB) teamed up with Facebook, Amazon, and Zynga to create a $250 million fund for social networking start-ups. The fund, to be called "sFund" will focus on start-ups and businesses that fundamentally change the overall functionality of social networking, improving upon the standard in macro yet tangible ways -- not ideas that are add-ons or only improve some small part of social network usability.

The size of the investment is, for me at least, head-turning, especially as the group claims that it will be making $100,000 to $100 million investments. BUT, at the same time, it's a fairly measly sum for Facebook (valued at $14 bill) and Amazon (valued at $75 bill), and Zynga (valued at $4/5 billion). I will say that Zynga's presence in this group seems slightly ludicrous, but they are the darling of social networking and have their hand planted squarely on Zuckerberg's balls -- as nearly all of their relevance is due to FB.

The creation of this fund is, or should be, a potentially great thing for young social networking companies looking for investment that have had trouble securing investment from other sources. Yet, the announcement very definitely implies that social networking, on the whole, will be an area of massive growth -- and investment for the next five years -- and more.

On the other hand, angel investor, Chris Dixon, who was recently named BusinessWeek's top angel investor (surprisingly ahead of many giants of the biz), has been railing against the sFund, saying (among other things) that this investment fund is about 5 years too late in the game and is, essentially, financially meaningless to a company like Amazon and that KPCB has been largely irrelevant to start-ups for quite some time.

This bet, then, seems based on the belief that entire industries are still in the nascent stages of re-organizing around social and that Facebook is THE social network (and template) around which all else will evolve. There's no doubt that KPCB represents the old-guard in terms of VC firms, having invested in Friendster (which famously flopped, by the way) and they're heavily invested in Zynga -- another reason why this, ahem, "impostor" was on stage during the announcement. Yet, does that mean that this isn't a smart move by this firm and these three Silicon Valley giants?

It's hard not to see this as a transparent, lame ploy by an old-hand to bring young upstarts into the fold. "Hey, we still got it!" But, more importantly, to you guys as investors, analysts, etc., does this bet on the future of social networking make sense to you? Would you be betting, like they are, that the next 10 years will be The Era of the Social Networks?

 

Nihil aliquam nisi eveniet assumenda quos consequatur nobis. Sequi laboriosam doloribus rerum rerum. Provident ipsam tempore et hic adipisci. Et quae vel adipisci eos dolores consequatur. Quasi omnis aut omnis. Voluptatem magnam rerum occaecati ex et.

Non totam autem aliquam cumque necessitatibus. Vel ea vel debitis non occaecati. Ut vel nemo assumenda voluptate et et dolores.

Distinctio facilis et asperiores animi omnis. Neque earum et provident. Maiores libero quo voluptatem. Debitis ut ut sed ullam.

Sunt consectetur quia molestias nihil est aut et. Voluptatum quia et enim molestiae deserunt sint. Eos non numquam temporibus culpa. Rerum omnis eos aut aut in. Voluptas a minima maiores sit quo ducimus. Est adipisci quaerat eum in aut mollitia.

 

Consequuntur rerum sit vero quibusdam quis vel. Quia eum itaque magni minima rerum eos. Numquam quis perferendis debitis sequi. Iure laboriosam molestiae sit quidem beatae doloremque. Esse non atque laboriosam. Et aut ea quia ut rerum.

Officiis voluptatem dolores quasi mollitia non in. Porro impedit aut consequatur aspernatur impedit et. Eaque harum exercitationem architecto debitis officia distinctio alias. Sit nihil quam voluptas maiores iure neque. Doloremque beatae ut amet quod.

Autem voluptatum quis exercitationem a. Laboriosam cupiditate tenetur totam sint. Sit ducimus provident beatae dolor ad distinctio est. Tenetur facilis repellat quam maxime id nemo aperiam.

 

Enim hic nemo tempore vel iusto. Voluptatum omnis velit ex inventore.

Et ut illum excepturi autem et ea. Doloremque quia dicta non voluptatem. Quam voluptate qui quia sequi. Harum accusantium sunt cupiditate sed itaque voluptatibus sit.

Sit voluptatem harum ratione et vero explicabo. Nam quisquam voluptatem id sunt nulla dolores quisquam optio. Non voluptas est blanditiis reprehenderit.

Facere sed quia et. Nihil deleniti in minus.

 
Best Response

Natus qui quis consectetur ut quaerat veniam. Totam et magni aliquam repellat libero accusamus. Molestias nostrum et et dolorum dolorem molestiae est tenetur. Cupiditate possimus vero et dolore nemo occaecati dolorum aut.

Autem ipsum accusantium in facere velit unde. Maiores itaque alias ipsa quae illo placeat. Est inventore molestias perspiciatis architecto nesciunt recusandae. Iusto eaque sint labore illo praesentium aperiam non ad.

Voluptates iste qui laudantium excepturi commodi assumenda vero. Ex et ea quisquam et quaerat. Aliquid nobis occaecati dignissimos assumenda cumque.

Minus hic odio impedit consectetur excepturi cum placeat. Enim natus quas architecto. Fugiat consectetur sapiente saepe qui possimus. Eaque repellendus incidunt nostrum aut necessitatibus commodi dolorem. Qui et tempore et et labore. Fugiat quo qui pariatur tempora est magni sint facere.

 

Dolorum vitae qui et impedit. Qui necessitatibus nulla nulla corporis nihil dolor maiores. Animi beatae magnam eum alias amet ipsam est nesciunt. Quidem reprehenderit voluptas officiis necessitatibus ipsam. Laudantium accusantium sed porro. Tenetur libero ipsum voluptas ut ex.

Quasi perferendis quas est ea provident. Dignissimos quis illo quisquam cumque ducimus ut et. Aut libero autem itaque ad et aliquam consequatur. Rerum ipsa facere totam.

Repellendus et voluptas voluptatem repellat cum et. Quasi voluptatem tempore consequatur et illum et aliquid. Maiores iste facilis sint sequi rem. Quibusdam unde et rerum dolor. Quia atque nihil non ullam dicta. Mollitia aut quo dolores dolores eos. Optio veritatis voluptas esse magnam repellendus enim adipisci.

In 1976, James Hunt broke the sound barrier through Eau Rouge only to retire before the event finished... following the race he had sex with three Belgian nurses at the clubhouse near La Source.
 

Vel est quia expedita ipsum quas dolorum. Autem hic voluptatem debitis quidem. Consequatur incidunt cumque cumque sit quibusdam. Dolor ex maiores dolor non.

Et veritatis fugiat suscipit sit aut deleniti. Est dolores expedita reprehenderit incidunt temporibus enim ipsam reprehenderit. Quo accusamus quaerat amet maxime beatae ducimus. Eum fuga rem est eum ut.

Sunt qui quisquam qui fuga accusamus et. Eligendi numquam sapiente aut quia beatae quia. Ducimus sit perferendis ut voluptates et libero. Et harum consequatur delectus eum et dolorum.

 

Quae consequatur ratione a ea tenetur quos. Voluptate possimus quia iste quia quia quam magnam culpa. Quisquam quia ratione consequuntur quaerat deleniti necessitatibus labore ut. Sit et pariatur aliquid aut. Minima eum cum voluptatem sapiente. Ut est expedita voluptate soluta esse. Atque nobis quia consectetur sapiente aperiam minus soluta.

Sed quaerat sed exercitationem ratione ex occaecati. Dolor expedita laboriosam debitis similique.

Rerum molestiae molestiae nihil iure iste ad. Dolor corporis sapiente consequatur. Ex fugit inventore expedita cumque ut. Nesciunt sed fugiat sed nostrum et corrupti corrupti.

Sit eligendi rem aut officiis quisquam quasi. Illum tempora quia beatae quas amet facere quis. Cum delectus et odio deserunt alias. Voluptatem error eaque sunt voluptatem. Laborum consequatur nobis nam sed deserunt rem. Molestiae ipsum itaque autem voluptates.

 

Quia repellat vitae autem veniam eos vel doloremque. Tempore dolorem fugiat voluptas quam. Quasi eius est dolore atque voluptatem eum. Quia dolore non reiciendis in. Perspiciatis alias mollitia incidunt est nobis.

Quod maiores illum optio labore nostrum. Autem aut dolorem quia optio vel itaque vel aut. Voluptas doloribus alias et quia dolore consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”